清末松嫩平原耕地重建方法比较分析（英文）

编号 zgly0001584317

文献类型 期刊论文

文献题名 清末松嫩平原耕地重建方法比较分析（英文）

作者 姜蓝齐  张丽娟  臧淑英  张学珍 

作者单位 KeyLaboratoryofRemoteSensingMonitoringofGeographicEnvironment  HarbinNormalUniversity  KeyLaboratoryofLandSurfacePatternandSimulation  InstituteofGeographicSciencesandNaturalResourcesResearch  CAS  JiangsuCollaborativeInnovationCen 

母体文献 Journal of Geographical Sciences 

年卷期 2016年02期

年份 2016 

分类号 S28  K252 

关键词 comparisonofmethods  croplandcover  lateQingDynasty  SongnenPlain  NortheastChina 

文摘内容 To understand historical human-induced land use/cover change(LUCC) and its climatic effects,it is essential to reconstruct historical land use/cover changes with explicit spatial information. In this study,based on the historically documented cropland area at county level,we reconstructed the spatially explicit cropland distribution at a cell size of 1 km × 1 km for the Songnen Plain in the late Qing Dynasty(1908 AD). The reconstructions were carried out using two methods. One method(hereafter,referred to as method I) allocated the cropland to cells ordered from a high agricultural suitability index(ASI) to a low ASI,but they were all within the domain of potential cropland area. The potential cropland area was created by excluding natural woodland,swamp,water bodies,and mountains from the study area. The other method(hereafter,method II) allocated the cropland to cells in the order from high ASI to low ASI within the domain of cropland area in 1959. This method was based on the hypothesis that the cropland area domain in 1959 resulted from enlargement of the cropland area domain in 1908. We then compared these two reconstructions. We found that the cropland distributions reconstructed by the two methods exhibit a similar spatial distribution pattern. Both reconstructions show that the cropland was mostly found in the southern and eastern parts of the Songnen Plain. The two reconstructions matched each other for about 68% of the total cropland area. By spatially comparing the unmatched cropland cells of the two reconstructions with the settlements for each county,we found that unmatched cropland cells from method I are closer to settlements than those from method II. This finding suggests that reconstruction using method I may have less bias than reconstruction with method II.