海岛绿道游客体验质量评价

编号 lyqk010127

中文标题 海岛绿道游客体验质量评价

作者 杨毅立  陈昱星  韩旭  胡俊峰  陈凌艳 

作者单位 福建农林大学艺术学院园林学院(合署) 福州 350100

期刊名称 中国城市林业 

年份 2023 

卷号 21

期号 1

栏目名称 研究论文 

中文摘要 海岛绿道作为一种具有特殊景观风貌的绿道,在满足一般绿道作为绿色基础设施功能的基础上,更要突出对海岛自然、文化景观的保护与串联功能。游客作为绿道的主要服务对象,其游览体验质量会对绿道建设产生很大的影响。文章从海岛绿道游客体验需求角度出发,以福州市平潭北部绿道为例,确定影响游客体验满意度的20个因子,运用IPA分析法进行评价研究。结果表明:平潭北部绿道需重点提升文化景观知名度、道路交叉口通行、交通指示连续性、夜间照明、骑行坡度、慢行设施分布情况等因子,并从突出海岛景观特色、提升骑行体验感、加强基础服务设施建设、分段打造多主题游览路径4个方面提出改进建议,为我国海岛绿道建设与提升提供参考。

关键词 绿道  景观评价  IPA分析法  满意度 

英文标题 Evaluation of Visitor Experience Quality of Island Greenways

作者英文名 Yang Yili, Chen Yuxing, Han Xu, Hu Junfeng, Chen Lingyan

单位英文名 College of Arts College of Landscape Architecture, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350100, China

英文摘要 Island greenway is a kind of greenway with special landscape. It has the conservation and connection functions of natural and culture landscape in islands apart from the basic function of green infrastructure. Tourists are the main users of the greenway services, and the quality of tourist experience greatly affects the construction of island greenway. From the perspective of tourists' experience demand for island greenway, the paper takes the northern greenway of Pingtan Island as an example to determine 20 factors that affect tourists' satisfaction degree of their tourism experience and use IPA analysis to evaluate the factors. The results show that the northern greenway of Pingtan Island needs to put focus on the factors of cultural landscape visibility improvement, road intersection access, traffic indication continuity, night lighting, cycling slope and slow walking facilities distribution. The paper then put forward suggestions in terms of highlighting island landscape characteristics, improving the cycling experience, strengthening infrastructure construction, and creating multi-themed tour paths by section. The study provides a reference for the construction and improvement of island greenways in China.

英文关键词 greenway;landscape evaluation;IPA analysis method;satisfaction degree

起始页码 126

截止页码 130,155

投稿时间 2022/1/2

作者简介 杨毅立(1997-), 男, 硕士生, 研究方向为风景园林规划设计。 E-mail:2432204284@qq.com

通讯作者介绍 陈凌艳(1986-),女,副教授,硕士生导师,研究方向为园林植物与观赏园艺研究。E-mail:fafucly@fafu.edu.cn

E-mail fafucly@fafu.edu.cn

DOI 10.12169/zgcsly.2022.01.02.0001

参考文献 [1] KURDOGLU O,KURDOGLU B C.Determining recreational,scenic,and historical-cultural potentials of landscape featuresalong a segment of the ancient Silk Road using factor analyzing[J].Environmental Monitoring Assessment,2010,170(8):99-116.
[2] 王向荣.自然与文化视野下的中国国土景观多样性[J].中国园林,2016,32(9):33-42.
[3] 曾真,朱南燕,王丹,等.基于游客游憩动机及行为特征下的城市绿道优化策略研究:以福州市福道为例[J].山东农业大学学报(自然科学版),2018,49(4):639-645.
[4] HOŞGÖR Z,YIGITER R.Greenway planning context in Istanbul-Halic:a compulsory intervention into the historical green corridors of Golden Horn[J].Landscape Research,2011,36(3):341-361.
[5] 余青,樊欣,刘志敏,等.国外风景道的理论与实践[J].旅游学刊,2006,21(5):91-95.
[6] BALTA M Z,YENIL H V.Multi criteria decision making methods for urban greenway:the case of Aksaray,Turkey[J].Land Use Policy,2019,89:104224.
[7] KEITH S J,BOLEY B B.Importance-performance analysis of local resident greenway users:findings from Three Atlanta BeltLine Neighborhoods[J].Urban Forestry and Urban Greening,2019,44:126426.
[8] SHISHMANOVA M V.Cultural tourism in cultural corridors,itineraries,areas and cores networked[J].Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences,2015,188:246-254.
[9] BISCHOFF A.Greenways as vehicles for expression[J].Landscape and Urban Planning,1995,33(1/3):317-325.
[10]TOCCOLINI A,FUMAGALLI N,SENES G.Greenways planning in Italy:the Lambro River Valley Greenways System[J].Landscape and Urban Planning,2004,76(1/4):98-111.
[11]PETTENGILL P R,LEE B H Y,MANNING R E.Traveler perspectives of greenway quality in Northern New England[J].Transportation Research Record:Journal of the Transportation Research Board,2012,2314(1):31-40.
[12]KOWARIK I.The Green Belt Berlin:establishing a greenway where the Berlin Wall once stood by integrating ecological,social and cultural approaches[J].Landscape and Urban Planning,2019,184:12-22.
[13]HOPPERT M,BAHN B,BERGMEIER E,et al.The Saale Unstrut cultural landscape corridor[J].Environmental Earth Sciences,2018,77:58.
[14]刘颂,李菀辰,丛楷昕.黄浦滨江绿道骑行环境感知评价[J].中国城市林业,2020,18(4):39-43,60.
[15]曾忠平,王雅丽,彭浩轩.基于SOPARC和KDE的游客游憩行为研究:以武汉东湖绿道为例[J].中国园林,2019,35(12):58-62.
[16]刘慧,鲍文娟,王嘉楠,等.基于游客体验的城市绿道适宜性评价[J].中国农业大学学报,2018,23(4):104-113.
[17]江堂龙,牛子君,胡妞燕,等.基于重要性-绩效性分析法的绿道满意度调查研究[J].生态环境学报,2016,25(5):815-820.
[18]CHANG P J,TSOU C W,LI Y S.Urban-greenway factors' influence on older adults' psychological well-being:a case study of Taichung,Taiwan[J].Urban Forestry and Urban Greening,2020,49:126606.
[19]贺慧,林小武,余艳薇.基于SD法的绿道骑行环境感知评价[J].新建筑,2019(4):33-37.
[20]李天颖,张延龙,牛立新.台湾台中市绿道规划设计及其功能的调查分析[J].城市发展研究,2013,20(4):137-141.
[21]ZELENSKI J M,DOPKO R L,CAPALDI C A.Cooperation is in our nature:nature exposure may promote cooperative and environmentally sustainable behavior[J].Journal of Environmental Psychology,2015,42:24-31.

PDF全文 浏览全文