编号
lyqk011113
中文标题
城市公园生产性景观价值对游客场所依恋的影响
作者单位
1. 中国农业大学土地科学与技术学院 北京 100193;
2. 河南师范大学公共政策与社会管理创新研究中心 河南新乡 453000;
3. 复旦大学历史地理研究中心 上海 200433;
4. 中国农业大学园艺学院 北京 100193
期刊名称
中国城市林业
年份
2023
卷号
21
期号
4
栏目名称
研究论文
中文摘要
以北京三山五园园外园地区为例,基于441份问卷构建结构方程模型,探究生产性景观价值对游客场所依恋的影响路径。结果表明:生产性景观的自然游憩价值、历史文化价值对场所认同与场所依赖有显著正向影响,科学教育价值对场所认同有显著正向影响。自然游憩价值的感知程度最强,但对场所认同的影响最弱;相反,历史文化价值的感知程度最弱,但对场所认同的影响最强。据此,生产性景观建设中可将自然游憩价值的强感知作为依据,同时以历史文化价值在场所依恋建构中的作用为指导,促进人本导向下的景观管护。
关键词
生产性景观
城市公园
场所依恋
景观价值
结构方程模型
基金项目
国家自然科学基金项目(42271105;42001224;41471455);中央高校基本科研业务费专项基金项目(2021TC072)
英文标题
Influence of Productive Landscape Values in Urban Parks on Visitors' Place Attachment
作者英文名
Xia Zheyi, Yuan Chengcheng, Wei Xue, Huang Yuwen, Wang Yi, Liu Liming
单位英文名
1. College of Land Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China;
2. Center for Public Policy and Social Management Innovation Research, Henan Normal University, Xinxiang 453000, Henan, China;
3. Center for Historical Geographical Studies of Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China;
4. College of Horticulture, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China
英文摘要
Taking the Yuanwaiyuan area of the Three Hills and Five Gardens in Beijing as a case, this paper constructs the structural equation model based on 441 questionnaires to analyze how productive landscape values influence visitors' place attachment. The findings show that natural/recreational values and historical/cultural values of productive landscape have significantly positive impacts on place identity and place dependence, and scientific/educational values have a significantly positive impact on place identity. Perceptions of natural/recreational values are the strongest, but their influence on place identity is the weakest. Conversely, perceptions of historical/cultural values are the weakest, but their influence on place identity is the strongest. Based on the findings, it is suggested that in the construction of productive landscapes, the strong perception of natural/recreational values can be used as a basis, meanwhile the historical/cultural values can be used as a guidance considering their role in constructing place attachment, in order to foster people-oriented landscape stewardship.
英文关键词
productive landscape;urban park;place attachment;landscape value;structural equation model
起始页码
164
截止页码
170
投稿时间
2022/12/22
作者简介
夏哲一(1997-),男,博士生,研究方向为城乡景观生态与可持续发展。E-mail:xiazheyi@cau.edu.cn
通讯作者介绍
刘黎明(1966-),男,博士,教授,研究方向为土地利用与景观规划。E-mail:liulm@cau.edu.cn
E-mail
liulm@cau.edu.cn
DOI
10.12169/zgcsly.2022.12.22.0001
参考文献
[1] 夏哲一,袁承程,刘黎明,等.城市绿地生产性景观的居民价值感知特征研究:以北京三山五园地区稻田景观为例[J].城市发展研究,2021,28(7):57-64.
[2] 宋吉贤,徐文辉.杭州市乡村生产性景观设计[J].中国城市林业,2017,15(2):38-41.
[3] 米满宁,张振兴,李蔚.国内生产性景观多样性及发展探究[J].生态经济,2015,31(5):196-199.
[4] HARRINGTON L M B.Alternative and virtual rurality:Agriculture and the countryside as embodied in American imagination[J].Geographical Review,2018,108(2):250-273.
[5] 陈蓉蓉,屠峰,吴玉柱,等.杭州临安社区花园土壤重金属污染特征及风险评估[J].中国城市林业,2022,20(4):7-14.
[6] EGERER M,ORDÓÑEZ C,LIN B B,et al.Multicultural gardeners and park users benefit from and attach diverse values to urban nature spaces[J].Urban Forestry and Urban Greening,2019,46:126445.
[7] ROMOLINI M,RYAN R L,SIMSO E R,et al.Visitors' attachment to urban parks in Los Angeles,CA[J].Urban Forestry and Urban Greening,2019,41:118-126.
[8] VERBRUGGE L,VAN DEN BORN R.The role of place attachment in public perceptions of a re-landscaping intervention in the river Waal (The Netherlands)[J].Landscape and Urban Planning,2018,177:241-250.
[9] 马源,梁恒,蔡云楠.基于三类国土空间的生产性景观发展模式研究[J].城市发展研究,2020,27(7):61-66.
[10] PEARSON L J,PEARSON L,PEARSON C J.Sustainable urban agriculture:stocktake and opportunities[J].International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability,2010,8(1/2):7-19.
[11] 高宁.与农业共生的城市:农业城市主义的理论与实践[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,2015.
[12] 黄姣,李双成.中国快速城镇化背景下都市区农业多功能性演变特征综述[J].资源科学,2018,40(4):664-675.
[13] BROWN G.Mapping spatial attributes in survey research for natural resource management:methods and applications[J].Society and Natural Resources,2004,18(1):17-39.
[14] 张妍,苏晓蕾,李晨,等.绿色景观的生产性功能回归[J].中国城市林业,2017,15(1):47-49.
[15] SU M M,DONG Y Z,WALL G,et al.A value-based analysis of the tourism use of agricultural heritage systems:Duotian Agrosystem,Jiangsu Province,China[J].Journal of Sustainable Tourism,2020,28(12):2136-2155.
[16] 张卉,张捷,仇梦嫄,等.音乐景观意象对游客地方依恋的影响研究:以厦门鼓浪屿为例[J].人文地理,2020,35(3):58-64.
[17] 林广思,吴安格,蔡珂依.场所依恋研究:概念、进展和趋势[J].中国园林,2019,35(10):63-66.
[18] WILLIAMS D R,VASKE J J.The measurement of place attachment:validity and generalizability of a psychometric approach[J].Forest Science,2003,49(6):830-840.
[19] JORGENSEN B S,STEDMAN R C.Sense of place as an attitude:lakeshore owners attitudes toward their properties[J].Journal of Environmental Psychology,2001,21(3):233-248.
[20] 李志飞,聂心怡.文化旅游地集体记忆对游客地方依恋的作用机理:以乌镇、平遥古城和凤凰古城为例[J].地域研究与开发,2018,37(3):95-100.
[21] 古丽扎伯克力,辛自强,李丹.地方依恋研究进展:概念、理论与方法[J].首都师范大学学报(社会科学版),2011(5):86-93.
[22] 王坤,黄震方,方叶林,等.文化旅游区游客涉入对地方依恋的影响测评[J].人文地理,2013,28(3):135-141.
[23] 陆相林,孙中伟.旅游涉入、满意度、地方依恋作用机制研究:以西柏坡红色游客为例[J].干旱区资源与环境,2017,31(7):183-188.
[24] 黄思颖,傅伟聪,刘群阅,等.福州城市绿地场所感知与场所依恋知觉关系[J].中国城市林业,2022,20(4):110-115.
[25] ROSSITER J R.The C-OAR-SE procedure for scale development in marketing[J].International Journal of Research in Marketing,2002,19(4):305-335.
[26] 何思源,闵庆文,李禾尧,等.重要农业文化遗产价值体系构建及评估(Ⅰ):价值体系构建与评价方法研究[J].中国生态农业学报(中英文),2020,28(9):1314-1329.
[27] PLIENINGER T,AV RANA H Á,FAGERHOLM N,et al.Identifying and assessing the potential for conflict between landscape values and development preferences on the Faroe Islands[J].Global Environmental Change,2018,52:162-180.
[28] XIA Z Y,YUAN C C,GAO Y,et al.Integrating perceptions of ecosystem services in adaptive management of country parks:a case study in peri-urban Shanghai,China[J].Ecosystem Services,2023,60:101522.
PDF全文
浏览全文