基于自然语言处理的北京城市公园使用后评价

编号 lyqk011080

中文标题 基于自然语言处理的北京城市公园使用后评价

作者 栗恩波  王静文 

作者单位 北京林业大学园林学院 北京 100083

期刊名称 中国城市林业 

年份 2023 

卷号 21

期号 3

栏目名称 研究论文 

中文摘要 采集北京市中心城区5类163个城市公园的评论数据,通过自然语言处理获取评论内容与情感倾向,基于空间建模确定城市公园满意度时空演变趋势;利用消极评论信息进行统计分析,确定不同类型城市公园存在的问题并提出相应提升措施。结果表明:在时序上,北京城市公园使用后评价满意度稳步提升;在空间上,北京城市公园的建设更注重均衡布局。消极特征的时序演变与回归分析表明城市公园更应注重管理与运维水平的提升。对不同类型城市公园而言,文化遗址与综合公园应提升交通组织与管理水平,游乐公园应注意动物福利与游乐设施维护,生态公园应注意内外交通组织与联系,社区公园应注重差异化并提升景观设计水平。

关键词 自然语言处理  城市公园  时空演变  使用后评价 

基金项目 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金(YX2013-18);华南理工大学亚热带建筑科学国家重点实验室开放课题(2019ZB07);北京林业大学建设世界一流学科和特色发展引导专项资金(2019XKJS0319)

英文标题 Post-Occupancy Evaluation of Beijing's Urban Parks Based on Natural Language Processing

作者英文名 Li Enbo, Wang Jingwen

单位英文名 School of Landscape Architecture, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China

英文摘要 This paper collects the comments on 163 urban parks in 5 categories in the central urban area of Beijing and obtains the comment content and emotional tendency using the method of natural language processing, to determine the spatio-temporal change in urban residents' satisfaction with urban park based on the spatial modelling. The statistical analysis is adopted to analyze the negative comments for determining the problems concerning different types of urban parks and proposing improvement measures. The results show that in terms of time sequence, urban residents' satisfaction with urban parks is steadily improving as the post-occupancy evaluation shows, and in terms of space, the construction of urban parks in Beijing is more focused on the balanced diffusion of space. The time series evolution and the regression analysis of negative characteristics show that urban parks should pay more attention to improving the level of management, operation and maintenance. For different types of urban parks, cultural heritage site and comprehensive parks should improve their traffic accessibility and management level, amusement parks should pay attention to animal welfare and the maintenance of amusement facilities, ecological parks should pay attention to internal and external traffic connectivity, and community parks should pay attention to differentiation and landscape design.

英文关键词 natural language processing;city park;spatio-temporal evolution;post-occupancy evaluation

起始页码 101

截止页码 108

投稿时间 2022/8/3

作者简介 栗恩波(1997-),男,硕士生,研究方向为城乡规划理论与设计。E-mail:rrubick@163.com

通讯作者介绍 王静文(1975-),女,博士,副教授,研究方向为城乡规划理论与设计。E-mail:yehan1130@126.com

E-mail yehan1130@126.com

DOI 10.12169/zgcsly.2022.08.03.0001

参考文献 [1] KONIJNENDIJK C C,ANNERSTEDT M,NIELSEN A B,et al.Benefits of urban parks[R].Copenhagen and Alnarp:International Federation of Park and Recreation Administration,2013:40-41.
[2] STURM R,COHEN D.Proximity to urban parks and mental health[J].The Journal of Mental Health Policy and Economics,2014,17(1):19.
[3] HEIDT,NEEF.Ecology,planning,and management of urban forests:International perspective[M].New York:Springer Science and Business Media,2007:84-96.
[4] LEE A C K,JORDAN H C,HORSLEY J.Value of urban green spaces in promoting healthy living and wellbeing:prospects for planning[J].Risk Management and Healthcare Policy,2015,8:131.
[5] JENNINGS V,BAMKOLE O.The relationship between social cohesion and urban green space:an avenue for health promotion[J].International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health,2019,16(3):452.
[6] ARONSON M F J,LEPCZYK C A,EVANS K L,et al.Biodiversity in the city:key challenges for urban green space management[J].Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment,2017,15(4):189-196.
[7] 郑天晨,严岩,章文,等.基于社交媒体数据的城市公园景感评价[J].生态学报,2022,42(2):561-568.
[8] 谷树忠,胡咏君,周洪.生态文明建设的科学内涵与基本路径[J].资源科学,2013,35(1):2-13.
[9] 龙瀛,罗子昕,茅明睿.新数据在城市规划与研究中的应用进展[J].城市与区域规划研究,2018,10(3):85-103.
[10] 张琳,张冰心,寇怀云.基于网络评论数据自然语言处理的江南古镇游客景观感知[J].中国城市林业,2022,20(6):125-132.
[11] 刘颂,杨莹,贾虎等.基于多源数据的上海城市公园使用满意度关键影响因素[J].中国城市林业,2020,18(2):51-56.
[12] HUAI SONGYAO,VAN DE VOORDE TIM.Which environmental features contribute to positive and negative perceptions of urban parks?A cross-cultural comparison using online reviews and Natural Language Processing methods[J].Landscape and Urban Planning,2022,218.
[13] 赵东汉.使用后评价POE在国外的发展特点及在中国的适用性研究[J].北京大学学报(自然科学版),2007,43(6):797-802.
[14] 陶晓丽,陈明星,张文忠,等.城市公园的类型划分及其与功能的关系分析:以北京市城市公园为例[J].地理研究,2013,32(10):1964-1976.
[15] 李生.自然语言处理的研究与发展[J].燕山大学学报,2013,37(5):377-384.
[16] 戴代新,陈语娴.基于情感计算的城市历史公园更新改造文化服务感知评价:以鲁迅公园更新改造为例[J].同济大学学报(社会科学版),2022,33(3):81-90.
[17] 谢秋逸,周年兴,轩源等.基于百度AI开放平台的北京市共享住宿顾客满意度及需求层次研究[J].南京师大学报(自然科学版),2021,44(1):64-70.
[18] 尤众喜,华薇娜,潘雪莲.中文分词器对图书评论和情感词典匹配程度的影响[J].数据分析与知识发现,2019,3(7):23-33.
[19] 赵占芳,刘鹏鹏,李雪山.基于改进TextRank的铁路文献关键词抽取算法[J].北京交通大学学报,2021,45(2):80-86.
[20] 闫盛枫.融合词向量语义增强和DTM模型的公共政策文本时序建模与演化分析:以大数据领域为例[J].情报科学,2021,39(9):146-154.
[21] MIKOLOV T,CHEN K,CORRADO G S,et al.Computing numeric representations of words in a high-dimensional space:US9037464[P].2015-5-19.
[22] 孙艳芝,张同升,刘雷.基于POE的徐州城市公园使用满意度评价[J].中国城市林业,2020,18(4):23-28.
[23] 陈婷婷,谭文浩,刘林丰等.福州国家森林公园的游客满意度影响因素[J].中国城市林业,2021,19(2):92-96.
[24] Central Park Conservancy,Inc.New York Central Park financial statements June 30,2020 and 2019[R].New York:the Central Park Conservancy,2020.
[25] 高雪梅,吴梓溢,余蕊均,等.兴市:公园城市,产城新生[EB/OL].http://www.xinhuanet.com/politics/2020-10/15/c_1126615682.htm,2020-10-15.

PDF全文 浏览全文