编号
lyqk011401
中文标题
沈阳市夏季6种城市绿地景观对使用者身心恢复的影响
作者单位
1. 沈阳农业大学林学院 沈阳 110866;
2. 杭州萧山技师学院 杭州 311201;
3. 华东师范大学体育与健康学院 上海 200062;
4. 上汇实验学校 上海 200031
期刊名称
中国城市林业
年份
2024
卷号
22
期号
1
栏目名称
专题:城市森林康养
中文摘要
城市绿地环境已被证实对人的身心健康有益,但人的感知评价需求如何影响环境发挥的健康效益仍有待深入研究。文章通过测量251名被试者的生理指标(血压、心率)和心理指标(POMS、PRS),探讨沈阳市夏季6种绿地景观对使用者的身心恢复的影响,以提高城市绿地的游憩和保健功能。结果表明:1)VR视频模拟的绿地景观对使用者的身心恢复同样具有效果;2)夏季绿地中林地对被试者的血压恢复效果最佳,水景对心率的舒缓效果最佳,近似绿化程度的环境中具有开敞特征的环境更能促进人的生理恢复;3)在各空间中被试者均呈现积极情绪增加、消极情绪减少的趋势,开敞度越高越能提升人的兴致勃勃感;4)夏季城市绿地中逃离性是最容易被感知的属性,水景的逃离性评价最佳,城市广场可以在迷人性与兼容性维度上调动人的注意力恢复;5)人对环境的感知评价与身心恢复关系密切,偏好、安全感、植物多样性、植物有序性、层次感、自然程度及开敞程度对环境的恢复性均有积极作用。综上可知,中国北方地区夏季不同城市绿地空间在生理及感知维度上对使用者具有一定的恢复效果。
基金项目
国家自然科学基金项目(31971714);辽宁省教育厅科学研究经费项目(LJK0687)
英文标题
Effects of Six Categories of Urban Green Spaces on Users' Psycho-physiological Restoration in Summer in Shenyang
作者英文名
Shen Linjun, Zhang Yuchen, Zhang Tong, Tong Yan
单位英文名
1. College of Forestry, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110866, China;
2. Hangzhou Xiaoshan Technician College, Hangzhou 311201, China;
3. School of Physical Education and Health, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China;
4. Shanghui Experimental School, Shanghai 200031, China
英文摘要
Urban green spaces (UGSs) have been proven to be beneficial to human physical and mental health. However, how human perceptual evaluation affects the health benefits of environment needs further research. Through measuring the physiological indexes (blood pressure and heart rate) and psychological indexes (POMS and PRS) of 251 participants, the paper discusses the effects of six categories of UGSs on users' psycho-physiological restoration in summer in Shenyang, with the aim to improve the recreational and health function of UGSs. The results show that: 1) The green space landscape simulated with VR video has the same effect on the psycho-physiological restoration of users; 2) Among the UGSs in summer, woodland has the best effect on blood pressure recovery, and waterscape has the best effect on heart rate reduction. The close-to-green-space environment with open characteristics performs better in the human physiological recovery; 3) In each sample space, the participants show a trend of more positive emotions than negative emotions. The larger open space in environments can better increase visitors' interests; 4) The escapability in UGSs in summer is the easiest attribute to be perceived, and the attribute in waterscape is the best evaluated. City square can increase users' attention in the dimension of fascination and compatibility; and 5) People's perceptual evaluation of environment is closely related to their physical and mental recovery. Preference, security, plant diversity, plant hierarchy, layering, degree of naturalness and degree of openness all have positive effects on environmental restoration. In a sum, different UGSs in summer in northern China have restorative effects on users in physiological and perceptual dimensions to a certain extent.
英文关键词
virtual reality;urban green space;stress recovery;perceptual evaluation
起始页码
118
截止页码
125
投稿时间
2022/9/20
作者简介
沈林骏(1998-),男,硕士生,研究方向为景观规划与人群健康。E-mail:18943686727@163.com
通讯作者介绍
张桐(1981-),男,博士,副教授,研究方向为风景园林理论及森林公园规划。E-mail:tongzhang@syau.edu.cn
E-mail
tongzhang@syau.edu.cn
DOI
10.12169/zgcsly.2022.09.20.0002
参考文献
[1] 刘群阅,吴瑜,肖以恒,等.城市公园恢复性评价心理模型研究:基于环境偏好及场所依恋理论视角[J].中国园林,2019,35(6):39-44.
[2] 羿可,杨定海.基于SD法的校园绿色空间恢复性知觉效益[J].中国城市林业,2022,20(5):125-130.
[3] NIELSEN T S,HANSEN K B.Do green areas affect health?Results from a Danish survey on the use of green areas and healthindicators[J].Health & Place,2007,13(4):839-850.
[4] PAQUET C,ORSCHULOK T P,COFFEE N T,et al.Are accessibility and characteristics of public open spaces associated with a better cardiometabolic health?[J].Landscape & Urban Planning,2013,118:70-78.
[5] STIGSDOTTER U K,EKHOLM O,SCHIPPERIJN J,et al.Health promoting outdoor environments:associations between green space,and health,health-related quality of life and stress based on a Danish national representative survey[J].Scandinavian Journal of Public Health,2010,38(4):411-417.
[6] KAPLAN R,KAPLAN S.The experience of nature:a psychological perspective[M].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1989.
[7] ULRICH R S.Aesthetic and affective response to natural environment[M].ALTMAN I,WOHLWILL J F.Behavior and the Natural Environment.Boston:Springer,1983.
[8] KAHN P H.Developmental psychology and the biophilia hypothesis:children's affiliation with nature[J].Developmental Review,1997,17(1):1-61.
[9] VAN DEN BERG A E,JORGENSEN A,WILSON E R.Evaluating restoration in urban green spaces:does setting type make a difference?[J].Landscape & Urban Planning,2014,127:173-181.
[10] 王茜,张延龙,赵仁林,等.四种校园绿地景观对大学生生理和心理指标的影响研究[J].中国园林,2020,36(9):92-97.
[11] LIU L H,QU H Y,MA Y M,et al.Restorative benefits of urban green space:physiological,psychological restoration and eye movement analysis[J].Journal of Environmental Management,2022,301:113930.
[12] MEYER-GRANDBASTIEN A,BUREL F,HELLIER E,et al.A step towards understanding the relationship between species diversity and psychological restoration of visitors in urban green spaces using landscape heterogeneity[J].Landscape & Urban Planning,2020,195:103728.
[13] JIANG B,CHANG C Y,SULLIVAN W C.A dose of nature:tree cover,stress reduction,and genderdifferences[J].Landscape & Urban Planning,2014,132:26-36.
[14] SONTI N F,CAMPBELL L K,SVENDSEN E S,et al.Fear and fascination:use and perceptions of New York's forests,wetlands,and landscaped parkareas[J].Urban Forestry & Urban Greening,2020,49:126601.
[15] WANG X X,RODIEK S,WU C Z,et al.Stress recovery and restorative effects of viewing different urban park scenes in Shanghai,China[J].Urban Forestry & Urban Greening,2016,15:112-122.
[16] FORNARA F,TROFFA R.Restorative experiences and perceived affective qualities in different built and natural urban places[C].International IAPS-CSBE & HOUSING Network,2009.
[17] SUBIZA-PÉREZ M,KORPELA K,PASANEN T.Still not that bad for the grey city:a field study on the restorative effects of built open urban places[J].Cities,2021,111:103081.
[18] ZHANG G C,YANG J,WU G W,et al.Exploring the interactive influence on landscape preference from multiple visual attributes:openness,richness,order,and depth[J].Urban Forestry & Urban Greening,2021,65:127363.
[19] 徐磊青,孟若希,陈筝.迷人的街道:建筑界面与绿视率的影响[J].风景园林,2017(10):27-33.
[20] GIDLOW C J,JONES M V,HURST G,et al.Where to put your best foot forward:Psycho-physiological responses to walking in natural and urban environments[J].Journal of Environmental Psychology,2016,45:22-29.
[21] PAYNE S R,BRUCE N.Exploring the relationship between urban quiet areas and perceived restorative benefits[J].International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health,2019,16(9):1611.
[22] 曲艺,张然,王大鹏.城市开放性公园老年人休闲活动时空特征研究:基于夏冬两季沈阳市老年人公园活动实态调查[J].建筑学报,2016(增刊2):87-91.
[23] 尹程程,李同予,翟长青等.恢复性虚拟自然环境研究进展:基于CiteSpace可视化分析[J].中国城市林业,2022,20(4):147-154.
[24] 丁宁,陈鹏程,金雪花.三种园艺活动对新冠疫情下大学生身心健康的影响[J].中国城市林业,2023,21(1):73-80.
[25] 迟松,林文娟.简明心境量表(BPOMS)的初步修订[J].中国心理卫生杂志,2003,17(11):768-770,767.
[26] 上田裕文,町田佳世子,河村奈美子,等.森林ウオ一キングによってもたらされる気分変化のプロセスに関する研究[J].ランドスケ一プ研究,2013,76(5),533-538.
[27] HARTIG T,KORPELA K,EVANS G W,et al.Validation of a measure of perceived environmental restorativeness.Psychology,Environmental Science,1996,26(7):1-64.
[28] VAN DILLEN S M E,DE VRIES S,GROENEWEGEN PP,et al.Greenspace in urban neighbourhoods and residents' health:adding quality to quantity[J].Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health,2012,66(6):e8.
[29] VON DAWANS B,STROJNY J,DOMES G.The effects of acute stress and stress hormones on social cognition and behavior:current state of research and future directions[J].Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews,2021,121:75-88.
[30] GIBSON J.The perception of visualsurfaces[J].The American Journal of Psychology,1987,100(3/4):646-664.
[31] 张霞,刘少镜.公共空间心理安全感要素分析与定量评价方法研究:以武汉大学校园为例[J].华中建筑,2020,38(12):85-93.
[32] GINTY A T,OOSTERHOFF B J,YOUNG D A,et al.Effects of arousal reappraisal on the anxiety responses to stress:breaking the cycle of negative arousal intensity and arousal interpretation[J].British Journal of Psychology,2022,113(1):131-152.
PDF全文
浏览全文