编号
lyqk009909
中文标题
北京中心城区小微绿地的蝴蝶多样性特征
作者单位
1. 中国林业科学研究院林业研究所 国家林业和草原局城市森林研究中心 北京 100091;
2. 中铁第五勘察设计院集团有限公司 北京 102600;
3. 北京市园林绿化局 北京 100013
期刊名称
中国城市林业
年份
2022
卷号
20
期号
3
栏目名称
研究论文
中文摘要
城市小微绿地,也称口袋公园,是城市区域生态廊道的重要组成部分,其生态功能特别是生物多样性承载功能不容忽视。文章以北京中心城区中面积1~4 hm2的48个小微绿地的蝴蝶群落为研究对象,采用样线法进行调查,运用丰富度、多样性、均匀度、优势度指数分析蝴蝶物种的空间分布和多样性差异。结果表明:1)北京中心城区小微绿地观测到的蝴蝶隶属于4科13属16种,古北种区系蝴蝶种类占总数的43.8%,广布种区系占56.2%。2)中心城区小微绿地内蝴蝶的科属及其数量存在很大差异,其中粉蝶科蝴蝶占50.5%,蛱蝶科蝴蝶占23.8%,灰蝶科蝴蝶占18.5%,凤蝶科蝴蝶占7.2%;菜粉蝶、黄钩蛱蝶、点玄灰蝶为优势种,大红蛱蝶、小红蛱蝶、琉璃灰蝶、红珠灰蝶、金凤蝶为少见种。3)小微绿地蝴蝶群落的多样性指数为灰蝶科>蛱蝶科>粉蝶科>凤蝶科,丰富度指数为灰蝶科>蛱蝶科>凤蝶科>粉蝶科,均匀度指数为灰蝶科>蛱蝶科>粉蝶科>凤蝶科,优势度指数为粉蝶科>蛱蝶科>灰蝶科>凤蝶科。4)五环内不同环路间城市区域小微绿地蝴蝶多样性未有明显的梯度差异。总体来看,北京中心城区小微绿地是蝴蝶活动的绿色空间,有可能成为有效联结大型生境斑块的生态跳岛,而且通过合理选择植物与配置群落结构、采用近自然管护模式,也可以维持较高的蝴蝶多样性水平。
基金项目
中央级公益性科研院所基本科研业务费专项资金经费项目我国城市森林生态系统服务功能及其动态变化(CAFYBB2020ZB008)
英文标题
Butterfly Diversity in Pocket Parks at Urban Core of Beijing
作者英文名
She Junying, Han Dan, Wang Cheng, Yin Luqin, Sun Zhenkai, Han Conghai
单位英文名
1. Research Institute of Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry; Urban Forest Research Center, National Forestry and Grassland Administration, Beijing 100091, China;
2. China Railway Fifth Survey and Design Institute Group Co., Ltd, Beijing 102600, China;
3. Beijing Municipal Forestry and Parks Bureau, Beijing 100013, China
英文摘要
Urban pocket parks are the important part of the urban ecological corridor. Their ecological functions, especially the carrying function for biodiversity, cannot be ignored. The butterfly survey is conducted using line transect method in 48 pocket parks with an area of 1-4 hm2 within the Beijing urban core. The spatial distribution pattern and diversity difference of butterflies in the pocket parks are analyzed using indices of the indices of Margalef' richness index, Shannon diversity index, Pielou's species evenness index and Simpson dominance index. The results are as follows: 1) 16 species of 13 genera and 4 families of butterflies are recorded in the survey, 43.8% of which are the Palaearctic realm and 56.2% are the widespread realm; 2) There is a great difference in the family as well as the number of butterflies in the pocket parks, among which Pieridae accounts for 50.5%, Nymphalidae 23.8%, Lycaenidae 18.5%, and Papilionidae 7.2%, and Pieris rapae, Polygonia c-aureum, and Tongeia filicaudis are the dominant species in the research area while Vanessa indica, Vanessa cardui, Celastrina argiolus, Lycaeides argyrognomon and Papilo machaon are the rare species; 3) The butterfly diversity index in the pocket parks is Lycaenidae>Nymphalidae>Pieridae>Papilionidae; the richness index is Lycaenidae>Nymphalidae>Papilionidae>Pieridae; the evenness index is Lycaenidae>Nymphalidae>Pieridae>Papilioidae and the dominance index is Pieridae>Nymphalidae>Lycaenidae>Papilioidae; and 4) There is no obvious gradient change in butterfly diversity in pocket parks between ring roads within the fifth ring road. It is concluded that pocket parks in urban core of Beijing is the green space to accommodate butterflies, and may become ecological jump islands effectively connecting large habitat patches in urban areas. The research finds that even for small green spaces, a relatively high level of butterfly biodiversity can be maintained if the plants are reasonably selected and configured under the close-to-natural management.
英文关键词
pocket park;butterfly diversity;dominant species;urban core of Beijing
起始页码
1
截止页码
6
投稿时间
2022-02-28 00:00:00
作者简介
佘珺莹(1997-),女,硕士,助理工程师,研究方向为城市森林规划设计。E-mail:junyingshe7657@163.com
通讯作者介绍
王成(1967-),男,研究员,博士生导师,研究方向为城市林业与城市生态。E-mail:wch8361@163.com
E-mail
wch8361@163.com
DOI
10.12169/zgcsly.2022.02.28.0002
参考文献
[1] 张庆费,许源.城市森林生物多样性保育途径探讨[J].中国城市林业,2016,14(3):1-5.
[2] 王成,蔡宝军,王军,等.北京平原森林建设对策研究与实践成效[M].北京:中国林业出版社,2021.
[3] 车生泉.城市绿地景观结构分析与生态规划:以上海市为例[M].南京:东南大学出版社,2003.
[4] 王保忠,王彩霞,何平,等.城市绿地研究综述[J].城市规划汇刊,2004(2):62-68,96.
[5] 张文英.口袋公园:躲避城市喧嚣的绿洲[J].中国园林,2007(4):47-53.
[6] THOMAS J A.Monitoring change in the abundance and distribution of insects using butterflies and other indicator groups[J].Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London,2005,360(1454):339-357.
[7] KELLERT S R.Values and perceptions of invertebrates[J].Conservation Biology,1993,7(4):845-855.
[8] SOGA M,KOIKE S.Life-history traits affect vulnerability of butterflies to Habitat fragmentation in urban remnant forests[J].Ecoscience,2012,19(1):11-20.
[9] NIELSEN A B,VAN DEN BOSVH M,MARUTHAVEERAN S,et al.Species richness in urban parks and its drivers:a review of empirical evidence[J].Urban Ecosystems,2014,17(1):305-327.
[10] KEITH S, BROWN J R.Conservation of neotropical environments:insects as indicators[M].Conservation of Insects and Their Habitats,1991.
[11] KREMEN C.Assessing the indicator properties of species assemblages for natural areas monitoring[J].Ecological Applications,1992,2(2):203-217.
[12] 王成,贾宝全,郄光发,等.北京平原造林的成效与发展对策研究[J].中国城市林业,2017,15(6):6-11.
[13] 周尧.中国蝴蝶分类与鉴定[M].郑州:河南科学技术出版社,1998.
[14] 武春生,徐堉峰.中国蝴蝶图鉴[M].福州:海峡书局,2017.
[15] 李爱民,邓合黎,马琦.重庆市生态功能区蝴蝶多样性参数[J].生态学报,2012,32(15):4869-4889.
[16] 周尧.中国蝶类志[M].上册.郑州:河南科学技术出版社,1999.
[17] 韩丹,王成,殷鲁秦.北京城市蝴蝶蜜源植物网络特征及重要蜜源植物识别[J].生态学报,2021,41(22):8892-8905.
[18] HAN D,ZHANG C,WANG C,et al.Differences in response of butterfly diversity and species composition in urban parks to land cover and local habitat variables[J].Forests,2021,12(2):140.
[19] LIZÉE M H,MANEL S,MAUFFREY J F,et al.Matrix configuration and patch isolation influences override the species-area relationship for urban butterfly communities[J].Landscape Ecology,2012,27(2):159-169.
[20] 陈领.古北和东洋界在我国东部的精确划界:据两栖动物[J].动物学研究,2004(5):369-377.
[21] SING K W,LUO J S,WANG W Z,et al.Ring roads and urban biodiversity:distribution of butterflies in urban parks in Beijing city and correlations with other indicator species[J].Scientific Reports,2019,9(1):7653.
[22] 邓合黎,马琦,李爱民.重庆市蝴蝶多样性环境健康指示作用和环境监测评价体系构建[J].生态学报,2012,32(16):5208-5218.
[23] RAMÍREZ-RESTREPO L,MACGREGOR-FORS I.Butterflies in the city:a review of urban diurnal Lepidoptera[J].Urban Ecosystems,2017,20:171-182.
[24] RUSZCZYK A,DE ARAUJO A M.Gradients in butterfly species diversity in an urban area in Brazil[J].Journal of the Lepidopterists' Society,1992,46(4):255-264.
[25] BLAIR R B,LAUNER A E.Butterfly diversity and human land use:Species assemblages along an urbangrandient[J].Biological Conservation,1997,80(1):113-125.
[26] KODANDARAMAIAH U,KONVICKA M,TAMMARU T,et al.Phylogeography of the threatened butterfly,the woodland brown Lopinga achine(Nymphalidae:Satyrinae):implications for conservation[J].Journal of Insect Conservation,2012,16(2):305-313.
[27] HAN D,WANG C,SUN Z K,et al.Microhabitat preferences of butterflies in urban parks:both vegetation structure and resources are decisive[J].Urban Forestryand Urban Greening,2022,71:127552.
PDF全文
浏览全文