编号
lyqk007116
中文标题
森林认证对森林转型的影响——来自发展中国家的经验证据
作者单位
北京林业大学经济管理学院, 北京 100083
期刊名称
世界林业研究
年份
2018
卷号
31
期号
5
栏目编号
3
栏目名称
问题探讨
中文摘要
森林转型理论总结了长期以来各国实现森林恢复的影响因素与作用机制。20世纪90年代以来,森林认证作为促进森林可持续经营的市场机制在世界范围内逐渐展开。文中基于1990-2010年76个发展中国家的面板数据,运用分位数回归方法定量分析森林认证对森林转型的影响。研究结果表明,森林认证对森林面积和森林蓄积量都具有显著的正向影响,且在森林资源相对缺乏的发展中国家影响更大;研究还发现,人口密度和人均GDP对森林面积和森林蓄积量具有显著的负向影响,而造林面积、林产品进口额以及非初级产品出口比重等对森林面积和森林蓄积量都具有显著的正向影响。
关键词
森林认证
森林转型
发展中国家
森林增长
分位数回归
基金项目
国家自然科学基金项目(71603023);中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目(2018RW17);中国博士后科学基金面上一等资助项目(2018M630088);北京林业大学热点追踪项目(2016BLRD04)。
英文标题
Li Lingchao
作者英文名
Li Lingchao, Cheng Baodong, Wei Siyi, Chen Jiaojiao
单位英文名
School of Economics and Management, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China
英文摘要
The forest transition theory summarizes the influencing factors and working mechanism of forest restoration in certain countries. Since the 1990s, forest certification has been gradually promoted in the world as a market mechanism to promote sustainable forest management. Based on the panel data of 76 developing countries from 1990 to 2010, the effects of forest certification on forest transition were quantitatively analyzed using the quantile regression method. The research results show that forest certification has significantly positive effects on forest cover and forest volume, especially in the developing countries where forest resources are relatively scarce. The study also finds that the population density and per capita GDP have significantly negative effects on forest cover and forest volume, while the afforested area, the value of forest products imports and the proportion of non-primary products export have significantly positive influence on forest cover and forest volume.
英文关键词
forest certification;forest transition;developing country;forest growth;quantile regression
起始页码
86
截止页码
91
投稿时间
2018/3/22
最后修改时间
2018/8/8
作者简介
李凌超(1987-),男,山东济宁人,博士,硕士生导师,主要研究方向为森林转型及林业经济,E-mail:ytlilingchao@126.com。
通讯作者介绍
程宝栋(1980-),男,山东泰安人,教授,博士生导师,主要研究方向为林产品国际贸易,E-mail:baodongcheng@163.com
E-mail
程宝栋(1980-),男,山东泰安人,教授,博士生导师,主要研究方向为林产品国际贸易,E-mail:baodongcheng@163.com
分类号
F316.23
DOI
10.13348/j.cnki.sjlyyj.2018.0070.y
参考文献
[1] MATHER A S.The forest transition[J].Area,1992,24(4):367-379.
[2] RUDEL T K,COOMES O T,MORAN E,et al.Forest transitions:towards a global understanding of land use change[J].Global Environmental Change,2005,15(1):23-31.
[3] MATHER A S.Recent Asian forest transitions in relation to forest-transition theory[J].International Forestry Review,2007,9(1):491-501.
[4] 李凌超,李心斐,程宝栋,等.基于环境库兹涅茨曲线的中国森林转型研究[J].世界林业研究,2016,29(4):56-60.
[5] BOWYER J L.The green movement and the forest products industry[J].Forest Products Journal,2008,58(7/8):6-13.
[6] KALONGA S K,KULINDWA K A.Does forest certification enhance livelihood conditions?:empirical evidence from forest management in Kilwa district, Tanzania[J].Forest Policy and Economics,2017,74:49-61.
[7] RAMETSTEINER E,SIMULA M.Forest certification:an instrument to promote sustainable forest management?[J].Journal of Environmental Management,2003,67(1):87-98.
[8] DURST P B,McKENZIE P J,BROWN C L,et al.Challenges facing certification and eco-labelling of forest products in developing countries[J].International Forestry Review,2006,8(2):193-200.
[9] ZHENG Y N,JIANG M Y.The influence of forest certification on forest product trade[J].Journal of Forestry Research,2002,13(4):316-318.
[10] 李凌超,刘金龙,孙伟娜,等.森林转型理论研究进展[J].北京林业大学学报(社会科学版),2016,15(2):54-58.
[11] 刘璨,吕金芝.中国森林资源环境库兹涅茨曲线问题研究[J].制度经济学研究,2010(2):138-161.
[12] 李凌超,刘金龙.政策与经济因素在森林转型中的作用:以福建长汀为例[J].林业经济,2015(2):100-104.
[13] 李凌超,董加云,刘金龙.政策综合在森林转型中的作用:以福建长汀为例[J].林业经济问题,2016,36(3):282-288.
[14] MEYFROID P,RUDEL T K,LAMBIN E F.Forest transitions, trade, and the global displacement of land use[J].Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,2010,107(49):20917-20922.
[15] JORGENSEN A K.Structural integration and the trees:an analysis of deforestation in less-developed countries, 1990-2005[J].The Sociological Quarterly,2008,49(3):503-527.
[16] ZOOMERS A.Globalisation and the foreignisation of space:seven processes driving the current global land grab[J].Journal of Peasant Stududies,2010,37(2):429-447.DOI:10.1080/03066151003595325.
[17] KULL C A,IBRAHIM C K,MEREDITH T C.Tropical forest transitions and globalization:neo-liberalism, migration, tourism, and international conservation agendas[J].Society and Natural Resources,2007,20(8):723-737.
[18] 丛之华,万志芳.国外森林认证研究综述[J].林业经济问题,2013,33(1):87-91.
[19] 徐斌.森林认证对森林可持续经营的影响研究[J].林业经济,2012(2):28-32.
[20] 张佩,杨伦增.中国实施森林认证的影响研究综述[J].林业经济,2014(8):103-108.
[21] KOENKER R,BASSETT G.Regression quantiles[J].Econometrica,1978,46(1):33-50.
[22] DEFRIES R,PANDEY D.Urbanization, the energy ladder and forest transitions in India's emerging economy[J].Land Use Policy,2010,27(2):130-138.
[23] GEIST H J,LAMBIN E F.Proximate causes and underlying driving forces of tropical deforestation[J].Bioscience,2002,52(2):143-150.
[24] MORETTI V,FERRARA A,COLANTONI A,et al.Forest transition and changes in the socio-economic structure of a developed country:a long-term analysis[J].Modern Economy,2014,5(9):932-938.
[25] TEMPLETON S R,SCHRR S J.Effects of demographic and related microeconomic change on land quality in hills and mountains of developing countries[J].World Development,1999,27(6):903-918.
[26] MATHER A S.Recent Asian forest transitions in relation to forest-transition theory[J].The International Forestry Review,2007,9(1):491-502.
[27] VIÑA A,McCONNELL W J,YANG H,et al.Effects of conservation policy on China's forest recovery[J].Science Advances,2016,2(3):4563-4566.
[28] YIRIDOE E K,NANANG D M.An economic analysis of the causes of tropical deforestation:Ghana[C].American Agricultural Economics Association Conference, Chicago, August 5-8,2001.
[29] RUDEL T K,SCHNEIDER L,URIARTE M.Forest transitions:an introduction[J].Land Use Policy,2010,27(2):95-97.
[30] LI L,LIU J,LONG H,et al.Economic globalization, trade and forest transition-the case of nine Asian countries[J].Forest Policy and Economics,2017,76:7-13.
PDF全文
浏览全文