福州国家森林公园视觉景观质量评价

编号 lyqk008138

中文标题 福州国家森林公园视觉景观质量评价

作者 邹咏忱  林宗贤  刘漫  倪海奔  丁铮 

作者单位 1. 福建农林大学园林学院 福州 35000;
2. 台湾逢甲大学 台中 40724

期刊名称 中国城市林业 

年份 2020 

卷号 18

期号 1

栏目名称 研究论文 

中文摘要 为科学量化福州森林公园景观美质，文章结合视觉管理评价法 （VMS）和景观美景度评价法（SBE）进行视觉景观评价。结果表明：1）VMS法对地形、色彩等因子评估，得出登山步道区景观美质最高，水景区景观美质较低；对观赏者、景观因子评价，得出人工设施区、专类园区景观敏感度较高，森林保育区景观敏感度最低；对坡度、植被、土地评估，得到人工设施区、溪谷区视觉接受度最高，保育区视觉接受度最低。2）SBE法评估得出溪谷区景观美质最高，保育区美质较低。3）VMS法与SBE法对景观美质评估及专家对景观敏感度的评价，加权得出登山道、专类园区视觉品质最高，而保育区视觉品质最低。建议重点发展人文区，大力开发人工设施区；对水景区进行修饰，对步道区及专类园区进行部分保留，其余均保留。

关键词 VMS法  SBE法  视觉景观评价  福州国家森林公园 

英文标题 Visual Landscape Quality Evaluation of Fuzhou National Forest Park

作者英文名 Zou Yongchen, Lin Zongxian, Liu Man, Ni Haiben, Ding Zheng

单位英文名 1. College of Landscape Architecture, Fu Jian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fujian Fuzhou 3530000, China;
2. Construction College, Feng-Chia University, Taichung 40724, Taiwan, China

英文摘要 In order to scientifically quantify the landscape beauty of Fuzhou Forest Park, the paper makes the visual landscape evaluation using the visual management system (VMS) and scenic beauty estimation (SBE). The results show that:1) the VMS evaluation of terrain, color and other factors indicates that the landscape of mountain hiking trails is the highest in beauty and quality, while the landscape beauty and quality of water scenic areas is lower. The VMS assessment of the audience and landscape factor signifies that the landscape sensitiveness is higher in artificial facilities area, while it is the lowest in special parks. The VMS assessment of the slope, vegetation and land shows that the visual acceptance for artificial facilities and valleys is the highest, and the visual acceptance of conservation areas is the lowest; 2) the evaluation using SBE method concludes that the landscape quality of the valley area is the highest, while the conservation area has the lower quality in its landscape; and 3) the evaluation of landscape beauty using VMS and SBE and expert evaluation of landscape sensitivity are weighted, which leads to the conclusion that the visual quality of hiking trail is the highest, and the conservation area has the lowest visual quality. Recommendations are proposed to be focused on the development of humanities areas, while more efforts should be put on the development of artificial facilities, the modification of water scenic area, the partial retention of the trail area and special park, and total retention of other areas.

英文关键词 visual management system (VMS) method;scenic beauty estimation (SBE) method;visual landscape evaluation;Fuzhou National Forest Park

起始页码 87

截止页码 91

投稿时间 2019/1/9

作者简介 邹咏忱(1995-),女,硕士研究生,研究方向为风景园林规划设计与理论研究。E-mail:909769470@qq.com

通讯作者介绍 丁铮(1968-),男,教授,硕士生导师,研究方向为生态修复及可持续研究。E-mail:604141713@qq.com

E-mail 604141713@qq.com

DOI 10.12169/zgcsly.2019.01.09.0001

参考文献 [1] 唐真,刘滨谊.视觉景观评估的研究进展[J].风景园林,2015(9):113-120.
[2] URIBE D,GENELETTI D,CASTILLO R F D,et al.Integrating stakeholder preferences and GIS-Based multicriteria analysis to identify forest landscape,Restoration Priorities[J].Sustainability,2014,6(2):935-951.
[3] 埃卡特·兰格,伊泽瑞尔·勒格瓦伊拉,刘滨谊,等.视觉景观研究:回顾与展望[J].中国园林,2012,28(3):5-14.
[4] 王燕琴,林恩文,王慧,等.城郊森林公园建设评价体系构建研究:基于鹫峰国家森林公园的实证检验[J].中南林业科技大学学报,2019,39(3):126-130.
[5] 徐莹,周祥.基于多因子生态容量与GIS技术的森林公园总体规划方法改进:以流溪河国家森林公园总体规划为例[J].中国园林,2016,32(10):68-72.
[6] 齐津达,傅伟聪,李炜,等.基于GIS与SBE法的旗山国家森林公园景观视觉评价[J].西北林学院学报,2015,30(2):245-250.
[7] 王娜,钟永德,黎森.基于SBE法的城郊森林公园森林林内景观美学质量评价[J].西北林学院学报,2017,32(1):308-314.
[8] MUNYARADZI C,EMMANUEL T,WILLEM F,et al.Analysis of landscape performance assessment by key stakeholders in a transfrontier conservation area[J].Landscape Research,2018,43(5):665-678.
[9] 许大为,李羽佳.基于SD-SBE法的专家与公众审美差异研究[J].中国园林,2014,30(7):52-56.
[10] 尤达,刘群阅,艾嘉蓓,等.森林公园游憩者依恋情感对恢复性体验影响研究[J].林业经济问题,2018,38(5):66-71,108.
[11] SMARDON R C.PALMER J F.Foundations for visual project analysis[M].NY:John Wiley&Sons,1986.
[12] ELSNER G H,SMARDON R C.Proceedings of Our national landscape[M].C.A:United States Departments of Agriculture-Forest Service,1979.
[13] 徐鼎,王忠君.基于SBE法的岭南四大名园景观美学评价[J].中国城市林业,2017,15(1):20-24.
[14] 张国庆,齐童,刘传安,等.视觉景观评价方法的回顾与展望[J].首都师范大学学报(自然科学版),2017,38(3):72-77.
[15] 黄书礼.应用规划方法于土地使用规划之研究-土地适宜性分析评鉴准则之研究与评鉴途径之探讨[M].台北:中兴大学都市计划书研究所,1987.

PDF全文 浏览全文