澳大利亚森林生态效益补偿市场化经验与启示

编号 lyqk009509

中文标题 澳大利亚森林生态效益补偿市场化经验与启示

作者 范苏  彭红军 

作者单位 南京林业大学经济管理学院，南京 210037

期刊名称 世界林业研究 

年份 2021 

卷号 34

期号 3

栏目名称 各国林业 

中文摘要 近年来，随着我国绿色发展、生态优先战略的实施，森林覆盖率持续提高，森林生态功能不断增强，构建市场化、多元化的森林生态补偿体系势在必行。文中以澳大利亚为例，总结其多元化、均衡的森林生态补偿体系，重点介绍其市场化的森林生态效益补偿机制——减排基金和生物多样性信托基金，并提出完善我国森林生态补偿机制和评价与监督体系的启示。

关键词 森林生态补偿  减排基金  生物多样性信托基金  澳大利亚 

基金项目 国家林业和草原局软科学项目“林业供给侧结构性改革的指标体系、评价与路径研究”（2019131032）

英文标题 Experiences and Enlightenment of the Market-based Forest Ecological Compensation Mechanism in Australia

作者英文名 Fan Su, Peng Hongjun

单位英文名 College of Economic and Management, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China

英文摘要 In recent years, it is imperative to establish a market-based and diverse forest ecological compensation system as the forest coverage has increased and the forest ecological functions strengthened as the result of the implementation of green development and eco-environment prioritization strategies. The paper summarizes the diversified and balanced forest ecological compensation system in Australia, and introduces the two market-based forest ecological compensation mechanisms, i.e., the Emissions Reduction Fund and the Biodiversity Conservation Trust. Finally, it concludes the enlightenment for China to improve the forest ecological compensation mechanism.

英文关键词 forest ecological compensation;Emission Reduction Fund;Biodiversity Conservation Trust;Australia

起始页码 112

截止页码 116

投稿时间 2020/5/24

最后修改时间 2021/4/19

作者简介 范苏，女，江苏连云港人，硕士研究生，从事林业金融等研究，E-mail：suf@njfu.edu.cn

通讯作者介绍 彭红军，男，安徽池州人，博士，教授，博士生导师，从事供应链金融、运筹与管理、农林经济管理等研究，E-mail：penghj@njfu.edu.cn

E-mail suf@njfu.edu.cn;penghj@njfu.edu.cn

分类号 F062.2，S7-9

DOI 10.13348/j.cnki.sjlyyj.2021.0029.y

参考文献 [1] 李国志. 森林生态补偿研究进展[J]. 林业经济,2019,41(1):32-40.
[2] COSTANZA R. Ecosystem services: multiple classification systems are needed[J]. Biological Conservation, 2007, 141(2):350-352.
[3] PATTANAYAK S K, WUNDER S, FERRARO P J. Show me the money: do payments supply environmental services in developing countries?[J]. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 2010, 4(2):54-274.
[4] 黄顺魁. 生态资源属性对不同生态补偿方式的影响[J]. 现代管理科学,2016(12):58-60.
[5] Montreal Process Implementation Group for Australia, National Forest Inventory Steering Committee. Australia’state of the forests report 2018[R]. Canberra: ABARES, 2018.
[6] PAGIOLA S, PLATAIS G. Payments for environmental services: from theory to practice[M]. Washington DC: World Bank, 2007.
[7] 袁伟彦, 周小柯. 生态补偿问题国外研究进展综述[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境,2014,24(11):76-82.
[8] 侯元兆, 吴水荣. 森林生态服务价值评价与补偿研究综述[J]. 世界林业研究,2005,18(3):1-5.
[9] Australian Bureau of Statistics. Recording Emissions Reduction Schemes in ABS statistics[EB/OL]. (2012-07-30)[2020-02-10]. https://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/mf/5257.0.55.001.
[10] 赵阳, 孙祯, 王影. 力拓集团: “生物多样性银行”的创意[J]. WTO经济导刊,2018(3):45-46.
[11] 王会. 森林生态补偿理论与实践思考[J]. 中国国土资源经济,2019,32(7):25-33, 51.
[12] NONG D. A general equilibrium impact study of the Emissions Reduction Fund in Australia by using a national environmental and economic model[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019, 216:422-434.
[13] NONG D, SIRIWARDANA M. Potential impacts of the Emissions Reduction Fund on the Australian economy[J]. Energy Economics, 2018, 74:387-398.
[14] SHAHNAZARI M, MCHUGH A, MAYBEE B, et al. Evaluation of power investment decisions under uncertain carbon policy: a case study for converting coal fired steam turbine to combined cycle gas turbine plants in Australia[J]. Applied Energy, 2014, 118:271-279.

发布日期 2021-04-22

PDF全文 浏览全文