编号 zgly0000363271
文献类型 期刊论文
文献题名 Eco-environment contribution of agroforestry to agriculture development in the plain area of China--Huai'an Prefecture, Jiangsu Province as the case study area
作者 RENHong-chang LUYong-long LIUCan MENGQing-hua SHIYa-juan
作者单位 ResearchCenterforEco-EnvironmentalSciences ChineseAcademyofSciences Beijing100085 China//AcademyofForestInventoryandPlanning StateForestryAdministration Beijing100714 China ResearchCenterforEco-EnvironmentalSciences ChineseAcademyofSciences Beijing100085 China ChinaNationalForestryEconomicsandDevelopmentResearchCenter Beijing100714 China AcademyofForestInventoryandPlanning StateForestryAdministration Beijing100714 China
母体文献 Journal of Environmental Sciences;环境科学学报: 英文版
年卷期 2005,17(2)
页码 327-331
年份 2005
分类号 X171.4 S728
关键词 平原造林 农业发展 中国 生态建设
文摘内容 For improving the environmental quality and ensuring supply of wood and non-timber forest products, many forests have been planted in plain areas of China. Scientists have studied their benefits, almost all of the approaches were based on tixed-point data, and few was considered on the non-efficient factors and temporal scale effects. This paper studies the positive and negative benefits at a large temporal scale, and the effects of plain afforestation on stockbreeding and rural economy. The benefits of plain afforestation, correlation coefficiency of agroforestry and production factors are analyzed via stochastic frontier modeling in Huanghuaihai Plain Area of China; elastic coefficient of agroforestry, husbandry, farming, and total output of agricultural sector are calculated through adopting partial differential equation. Some conclusions can be drawn that, plain forests have an important effect on the development of plain agriculture. But shelterbelts and small-soale forests have different effect on the development of agricultural economy. Shelterbelts have negative effect on the industries, but small-soale forest has positive effect. On the whole, contribution of forest resource to value of animal husbandry and gross production value of agriculture is positive, and to the value of farming is negative。