国际立法中的湿地恢复激励机制及启示

编号 lyqk005938

中文标题 国际立法中的湿地恢复激励机制及启示

作者 韩君芳  田信桥  马兰兰 

作者单位 浙江农林大学法政学院,杭州 311300,浙江农林大学法政学院,杭州 311300,浙江农林大学法政学院,杭州 311300

期刊名称 世界林业研究 

年份 2017 

卷号 30

期号 3

栏目编号 1

栏目名称 专题论述 

中文摘要 湿地恢复激励机制在《生物多样性公约》、《湿地公约》等国际性立法中得到了充分体现，其主要方式有以直接付费、反向财政激励、以税收减免为主的财政性激励机制和以良好宣传的激励、独占使用湿地资源的激励、湿地缓解银行激励为主的非财政性激励机制。文中对这些激励机制进行了规范考察和效果分析，提出在湿地保护制度和机制构建中借鉴国际立法中的湿地恢复激励机制成功经验、丰富湿地恢复激励方式、拓宽湿地恢复资金来源、推行社区共管的湿地管理模式、加强公众环境教育是实现湿地资源保护的有效途径。

关键词 湿地保护  湿地恢复  激励机制  国际立法  激励方式 

基金项目 浙江省大学生科技创新活动计划（新苗人才计划）“长三角区域大气污染联防联控的地方立法研究及推广”（2016R412042）。

英文标题 etland Restoration Incentive Mechanism in International Legislation and Its Enlightenment

作者英文名 Han Junfang, Tian Xinqiao and Ma Lanlan

单位英文名 School of Law and Politics,Zhejiang Agriculture and Forestry University,Hangzhou 311300,China,School of Law and Politics,Zhejiang Agriculture and Forestry University,Hangzhou 311300,China and School of Law and Politics,Zhejiang Agriculture and Forestry University,Hangzhou 311300,China

英文摘要 The incentive mechanism of wetland restoration is well reflected in the international legislation such as Convention on Biological Diversity and Ramsar Convention. The main types are financial incentive mechanism which includes direct payments, avoidance of financial penalties, tax deductions and credits, and non-cash incentive mechanism which includes the incentive of favorable publicity, the incentive to exclusive use wetland resources and wetland mitigation banking. After the investigation and analysis of these incentive mechanisms, the paper proposed that in the establishment of wetland protection system and mechanism, learning the successful experiences of wetland restoration incentive mechanism in international legislation to enrich wetlands restoration incentive methods, broaden the funding sources of wetland restoration, promote the community wetland co-management mode and strengthen the public environmental education is the effective way to protect wetland resources.

英文关键词 wetland protection;wetland restoration;incentive mechanism;international legislation;incentive method

起始页码 6

截止页码 11

投稿时间 2016/8/27

分类号 DF46

DOI 10.13348/j.cnki.sjlyyj.2017.03.001

参考文献 [1] Commission of the European Communities.Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the European Economic and Social Committee, and the Committee of the Regions:a mid-term assessment of implementing the EC Biodiversity Action Plan[J].Journal of International Wildlife Law & Policy,2009,12(1/2):108-120.
[2] GARDNER R C.Rehabilitating nature:a comparative review of legal mechanisms that encourage wetland restoration efforts[J].Catholic University Law Reviewm,2002/2003,52:573-620.
[3] IUCN-the World Conservation Union:environmental activities, 1988-1990[J].Colorado Journal of International Environmental Law & Policy,1991,2:303-314.
[4] LEWIS B.Environmental rights or a right to the environment:exploring the nexus between human rights and environmental protection[J].Macquarie Journal of International & Comparative Environmental Law,2012,8:36-47.
[5] HAMILTON N D.Harvesting the law:personal reflections on thirty years of change in agricultural legislation[J].Creighton Law Review,2012/2013,46:563-590.
[6] GARDNER R C.Money for nothing:the rise of wetland fee mitigation[J].Virginia Environmental Law Journal,2000,19(1):1-56.
[7] BONELLS M.Private nature reserves:an innovative wetland protection mechanism to fill in the gaps left by the SWANCC and rapanos ruling[J].Environs Environmental Law & Policy,2012/2013,36:1-34.
[8] GLAZEBROOK J S.Human rights and the environment[J].Victoria University of Wellington Law Review,2009,40:293-350.
[9] STRAND M.Do the mitigation regulations satisfy the law:wait and see[J].Stetson Law Review,2008/2009,38:273-310.
[10] DOYLE M W,BENDOR T.Evolving law and policy for freshwater ecosystem service market[J].William & Mary Environmental Law & Policy Review,2011/2012,36(1):153-192.
[11] 张术环,杨舒涵.生态补偿制度安排体系研究[J].前沿,2009(19):159-162.
[12] 朱建国.我国湿地保护立法的意义、现状及几点建议[J].中国土地科学,1999,13(1):13-14,8.

PDF全文 浏览全文