河流型城市湿地公园“生态—审美冲突”的表征及对策

编号 lyqk010225

中文标题 河流型城市湿地公园“生态—审美冲突”的表征及对策

作者 费凡  岳邦瑞  聂静  王佳楠 

作者单位 西安建筑科技大学建筑学院 西安 710055

期刊名称 中国城市林业 

年份 2023 

卷号 21

期号 2

栏目名称 研究论文 

中文摘要 基于主客交融的当代土地伦理,剖析生态特征与审美体验间的潜在分歧,有助于促进城市湿地公园保护利用价值的协同增效。以西安灞桥生态湿地公园为例,综合生态敏感性分析、景色质量评价、程序性扎根理论,按照区域识别—偏好调查—冲突表征路径探讨生态—审美冲突的表征、机理与对策。结果表明:1)滨水滩地、混交林带与坑塘水洼是10类常见冲突的潜在场景;2)审美习性—动态性审美模式—异质性与认知限制—尺度性3对主客矛盾是冲突生成的内在机理;3)多类型的观景网络优化人文关怀线索的设计显露多维立体的阐释系统构建可作为冲突协调的有效对策。因此,生态—审美冲突作为审美预期差异引发的价值误判具有普遍性,从景观感知视角助推公众的审美意识变革可为湿地公园生态设计提供积极补充。

关键词 景观感知  城市湿地公园  生态—审美冲突  问题表征  设计策略 

基金项目 国家自然科学基金项目(51578437)

英文标题 Characterization and Countermeasures of Ecological-Aesthetic Disjuncture in Urban River Wetland Parks

作者英文名 Fei fan, Yue Bangrui, Nie Jing, Wang Jianan

单位英文名 College of Architecture, Xi'an University of Architecture and Technology, Xi'an 710055, China

英文摘要 There is a spatial relationship between green park space and urban functional space, and the law and the scale characteristics of green park spaces need to be revealed. With POI data, standard deviation ellipse, kernel density analysis and bivariate Ripley's K function, the paper expounds the distribution relationship between urban green park space and urban function space in Nanjing. The results show that:1) Green park spaces show the trend of equilibrium distribution and local clustering, traffic spaces is balanced in distribution, and the clustering of public service space, residential space and business service space tends to decreases from the center to the periphery; 2) Within the urban core area, green park space and functional space are in a significant interactive mode. Green park spaces begin to cluster 1200m, 1300m and 1600m away from public service space, residential space and commercial service space, respectively. Traffic spaces show little difference with different distances; and 3) The old town has weaker clustering trend than the city core. The green park spaces are in conflicts in terms of configuration with public service, residential, transportation and commercial service spaces at 1 500 m, 1 200 m, 900 m and 300 m, respectively. Beyond these distances, the layout probability of each functional space is increasing, and only green park space and traffic space show a significant positive interaction. The results are helpful to enhance the interaction between green park space and urban spaces, and provide a science basis for the coordinated development and efficient interaction between green park space and functional spaces.

英文关键词 landscape perception;urban wetland park;ecological-aesthetic disjuncture;problem characterization;design strategy

起始页码 91

截止页码 97

投稿时间 2022/10/17

作者简介 费凡(1993-),男,博士生,研究方向为景观感知与评估。E-mail:370412581@qq.com

通讯作者介绍 岳邦瑞(1973-),男,博士,教授,博士生导师,研究方向为西北脆弱生态区景观生态规划理论与方法、西部乡土景观生态智慧、大秦岭生态保护。E-mail:bangruiyue@126.com

E-mail bangruiyue@126.com

DOI 10.12169/zgcsly.2022.10.17.0001

参考文献 [1] 成玉宁,张祎,张亚伟,等.湿地公园设计[M].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2012:2-4.
[2] 张凯莉,周曦,高江菡.湿地、国家湿地公园和城市湿地公园所引起的思考[J].风景园林,2012(6):108-110.
[3] 粟娟,潘勇军.从退化果园到生物多样性丰富的绿色休闲空间:基于广州海珠湿地修复实践[J].中国城市林业,2022,20(6):25-30.
[4] 王敏,陈梦璇,宋昊洋.生境质量与游憩服务的耦合协调对滨水空间活力的影响[J].中国城市林业,2022,20(3):7-13.
[5] 邹萍秀,曹磊,王焱,等.湿地美学的研究方法与进展:从心理物理范式的视角考察[J].中国园林,2020,36(7):105-110.
[6] COTTET M,PIEGAY H,BORNETTE G.Does human perception of wetland aesthetics and healthiness relate to ecological functioning?[J].Journal of Environmental Management,2013,128(15):1012-1022.
[7] GOBSTER P H,NASSAUER J I,DANIEL T C,et al.The shared landscape:what does aesthetics have to do with ecology?[J].Landscape Ecology,2007,22(7):959-972.
[8] DANIEL T C.Whither scenic beauty?Visual landscape quality assessment in the 21st century[J].Landscape and Urban Planning,2001,54(1):267-281.
[9] LEE L H.Perspectives on landscape aesthetics for the ecological conservation of wetlands[J].Wetlands,2017,37(2):381-389.
[10] DOBBIE M F.Public aesthetic preferences to inform sustainable wetland management in Victoria,Australia[J].Landscape and Urban Planning,2013,120:178-189.
[11] DOBBIE M,GREEN R.Public perceptions of freshwater wetlands in Victoria,Australia[J].Landscape and Urban Planning,2013,110:143-154.
[12] 保罗·戈比斯特,杭迪.西方生态美学的进展:从景观感知与评估的视角看[J].学术研究,2010,305(4):2-14,159.
[13] 王敏,侯晓晖,汪方心怡,等.城市河流生态修复的生态审美偏好影响机制研究:基于江苏省昆山市的实证研究[J].景观设计学(中英文),2022,10(1):40-63.
[14] 汪方心怡,王敏.多重生态系统服务需求下滨水绿道供给优化与精明发展[J].中国城市林业,2022,20(2):51-56,124.
[15] 李佳阳,琼·艾弗森·纳索尔.以生态健康的文化可持续性为目标进行审美体验设计[J].景观设计学(中英文),2021,9(5):72-79.
[16] 孙明阳,邹元春,于晓菲,等.湿地景观生态美学感知与评估体系研究[J].湿地科学,2018,16(6):700-706.
[17] 王敏,侯晓晖,汪洁琼.生态-审美双目标体系下的乡村景观风貌规划:概念框架与实践途径[J].风景园林,2017,143(6):95-104.
[18] 邱烨珊,车生泉.基于生态审美的城市生态绿地构建对策[J].风景园林,2022,29(7):37-43.
[19] 汪辉,李明阳,张艳,等.湿地公园生态适宜性分析与景观规划设计[M].南京:东南大学出版社,2018:1-7.
[20] 汪辉,李卫正,孔令娜,等.湿地公园生态敏感性评价研究:以盐城珍禽湿地公园为例[J].中国园林,2014,30(10):112-115.
[21] 邹咏忱,丁铮.利用VMS法福州国家森林公园景观资源评价[J].三明学院学报,2019,36(4):6.
[22] 保罗·凯迪.湿地生态学:原理与保护[M].兰志春,黎磊,沈瑞昌,译.北京:高等教育出版社,2018:17-30.
[23] 陆健健,何文珊,童春富,等.湿地生态学[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2006:75-76.

PDF全文 浏览全文