合肥城市显著树树种结构、多样性和空间分布格局

编号 lyqk008934

中文标题 合肥城市显著树树种结构、多样性和空间分布格局

作者 王嘉楠  童伶俐  张恒 

作者单位 1. 安徽农业大学林学与园林学院 合肥 230036;
2. 安徽建工技师学院 合肥 230036

期刊名称 中国城市林业 

年份 2021 

卷号 19

期号 4

栏目名称 研究论文 

中文摘要 为进一步挖掘城市树木的生态潜力，提高城市环境下树种的多样性，促进城市树木的可持续发展，文章根据城市显著树评价标准，在对合肥市一环主城区、瑶海区和政务区内分布的显著树进行实地认定的基础上，就合肥城市显著树的树种结构、多样性和空间分布规律作进一步的分析。结果表明：1）3区共认定显著树528株，隶属27科36属40种，其中，定性指标评定23株，定量指标评定505株；数量分布上，瑶海区>一环主城区>政务区；树种相对丰度排名前4依次为二球悬铃木、香樟、银杏和雪松。2）显著树树龄结构上以20~40年居多，百年以上仅22株；常绿与落叶树种种类比为1：3，株数比为149：379；乡土树种共23种，占比57.50%。3）区域分布上，瑶海区显著树平均树高与冠幅面积最大，一环主城区平均胸径、Shannon-Wiener指数和Simpson指数最高，政务区物种均匀度指数最高。4）不同立地类型中，城市道路、居住用地和公园的显著树分布最多，机关团体、学校、公共设施用地、风景名胜和宗教用地显著树数量占比仅11.74%。

关键词 城市森林  显著树  树种多样性  空间分布  合肥市 

基金项目 中央财政林业科技项目毛竹笋材两用林生态高效经营利用研究及示范推广（皖[2018]TG02号）；安徽省林业科技创新研究项目城市森林质量精准提升关键技术研究（AHLYCX-2019-01）

英文标题 Structure, Diversity and Spatial Distribution Pattern of Significant Tree Species in Hefei City

作者英文名 Wang Jianan, Tong Lingli, Zhang Heng

单位英文名 1. College of Forestry and Landscape Architecture, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei 230036, China;
2. Anhui Construction Engineering Technician College, Hefei 230036, China

英文摘要 In order to further tap the ecological potential of urban trees, improve the diversity of tree species in urban environment, and promote the sustainable development of urban trees, this paper further analyzes the structure, diversity and spatial distribution law of the prominent tree species in Hefei city on the basis of on-the-spot identification of the prominent trees distributed in the main city, Yaohai district and government district of Hefei City according to the evaluation criteria of urban prominent tree species. The results show that:1) 528 significant trees are identified in the three districts, belonging to 40 species, 36 genera and 27 families, with 23 trees evaluated by qualitative index and 505 trees by quantitative index. In quantity distribution, the number of significant trees in the three districts is ranked as Yaohai District > First Ring Road City > Government Affairs District. The top four tree species in relative abundance are Platanus acerifolia, Cinnamomum camphora, Ginkgo biloba and Cedar. 2) In terms of the tree age structure, most trees are 20~40 year old, and only 22 trees are over 100 years old; The ratio of evergreen to deciduous tree species is 1:3, and the ratio of plant to tree is about 7:18; There are 23 native tree species accounting for 57.50%, but only 171 trees. 3) In terms of area distribution, the average tree height and crown area in Yaohai District are the largest, the average DBH, Shannon-Wiener index and Simpson index in the first-ring city area are the highest, and the species evenness index in Government District is the highest. 4) In terms of site types, most significant trees are distributed in urban streets, residential areas and parks, and only 11.74% of them are distributed in government organizations, schools, public facilities, scenic spots and religious land.

英文关键词 urban forest;significant tree;tree species diversity;spatial distribution;Hefei City

起始页码 6

截止页码 11

投稿时间 2021/4/17

作者简介 王嘉楠(1975-),男,博士,教授,研究方向为城市林业与园林规划。E-mail:wjn@ahau.edu.cn

DOI 10.12169/zgcsly.2021.04.17.0001

参考文献 [1] 王嘉楠,程立,刘慧,等.城市森林显著树的认定及分布特征[J].浙江农林大学学报,2018,35(2):340-346.
[2] ROMAN L A.How many trees are enough? Tree death and the urban canopy[J].Scenario Journal.Scenario,2014,4:1-8.
[3] NOWAK D J,GREENFIELD E J.Tree and impervious cover change in U.S.cities[J].Urban Forestry & Urban Greening,2012,11(1):21-30.
[4] ZHANG H,LAI P Y,JIM C Y.Species diversity and spatial pattern of old and precious trees in Macau[J].Landscape & Urban Planning,2017,162:56-67.
[5] BRADSHAW A D,HUNT W B,WALMSLEY T.Trees in the urban landscape:principles and practice[M].London:E & FN Spon,1995.
[6] 林广思.我国园林树木管理法规现状及评析[J].中国园林,2013,29(7):113-116.
[7] SCHMIED A,PILLMANN W.Tree protection legislation in European cities[J].Urban Forestry and Urban Greening,2003,2(2):115-124.
[8] STAGOLL K,LINDENMAYER D B,KNIGHT E,et al.Large trees are keystone structures in urban parks[J].Conservation Letters,2012,5(2):115-122.
[9] 刘爽,吴永波.城市土壤压实对树木叶片叶绿素及光合生理特性影响[J].生态环境学报,2010,19(1):172-176.
[10] 刘瑜,徐程扬.古树健康评价研究进展[J].世界林业研究,2013,26(1):37-42.
[11] 王嘉楠,夏媛倩,赵德先,等.城市森林主要树种树冠尺度及生长空间需求[J].北京林业大学学报,2018,40(3):42-54.
[12] ROMAN L A,SCATENA F N.Street tree survival rates:meta-analysis of previous studies and application to a field survey in Philadelphia,PA,USA[J].Urban Forestry & Urban Greening,2011,10(4):269-274.
[13] 黄应锋,孙冰,廖绍波,等.深圳市古树资源特征与分布格局[J].植物资源与环境学报,2015(2):104-111.
[14] 靳思佳,孙超,车生泉.古树名木与城市结构关系研究:以上海市松江区为例[J].上海交通大学学报(农业科学版),2012,30(2):17-23.
[15] MEYER J G.America's famous and historic trees[M].New York:Houghton Mifflin,2001.
[16] 周天鸿,王云才.上海古树名木及古树后续资源与城市生态网络的空间关系[J].中国城市林业,2020,18(6):37-42,48.

PDF全文 浏览全文