我国林草学术期刊综合影响力评价

编号 lyqk011454

中文标题 我国林草学术期刊综合影响力评价

作者 余珊  王登举  宁攸凉  陈悦 

作者单位 1. 中国林业科学研究院林业科技信息研究所 北京 100091;
2. 国家林业和草原局产业发展规划院 北京 100010

期刊名称 林草政策研究 

年份 2023 

卷号 3

期号 4

栏目名称 实证分析 

中文摘要 开展学术期刊评价是加强学术期刊管理、推动学术期刊高质量发展的重要手段。文中在比较分析国内外主要期刊评价体系的基础上,构建了适用于我国林草学术期刊的评价指标体系,采用熵权法确定各评价指标权重,对我国67种自然科学与工程技术类林草学术期刊和7种人文社会科学类林草学术期刊2011—2020年的综合影响力进行了评价,重点分析了2020年的综合影响力评价结果及10年间的综合影响力变化。基于评价结果,总结了林草学术期刊发展存在的主要问题:1)林草学术期刊精品较少,综合影响力总体不高;2)指标表现短板明显,学术水平、认可度、关注度亟待提升;3)10年间综合影响力变化不大,整体向上的发展态势不显著。针对存在的问题,提出了提高林草学术期刊综合影响力的对策建议:1)加大组稿审稿力度,着力提升期刊学术水平;2)加大宣传推介力度,着力提升期刊认可度;3)加大数字化转型力度,着力提升期刊关注度;4)加大政策支持力度,着力优化办刊环境。

关键词 林业和草原  学术期刊  指标体系  熵权法  综合影响力 

基金项目 国家林业和草原局软科学项目“林草科技成果分类评价研究”(2022131002);林业行业标准制修订项目“《林草科技成果评价指南》制定”(2023-LY-080)

英文标题 Comprehensive Impact Evaluation of Forestry and Grassland Related Scientific Journals in China

作者英文名 Yu Shan, Wang Dengju, Ning Youliang, Chen Yue

单位英文名 1. Research Institute of Forestry Policy and Information, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing 100091, China;
2. Industry Development and Planning Institute, National Forestry and Grassland Administration, Beijing 100010, China

英文摘要 The evaluation of scientific journals is an important means to strengthen the management and high-quality development of scientific journals. Based on the comparative analysis of the evaluation systems available for journal influence at home and abroad， this paper constructs an evaluation index system suitable for China’s forestry and grassland related scientific journals， and determine the weight of each index using the entropy weight method. The comprehensive impact factor of 67 journals of nature science and engineering and 7 journals of social science from 2011 to 2020 is evaluated. The comprehensive impact evaluation reasults in 2020 are emphatically analyzed， and the change in the comprehensive impact between 2011 and 2020 is analyzed. Based on the evaluation results， the main problems in the development of forestry and grassland related scientific journals include:1) There are few well-recognized scientific journals for forestry and grassland study， and their comprehensive impact is overall not high； 2) There are obvious gaps in indicator performance， indicating low academic level， low recognition and less attention； and 3) The comprehensive impact has changed little in the past 10 years， without distinct upward trend. In view of the problems， this paper puts forward the countermeasures and suggestions to improve the comprehensive impact of forestry and grassland related scientific journals:1) Increasing the efforts to organize and review manuscripts for improving the academic level of journals； 2) Boosting publicity and promotion activities to make the journals better recognized； 3) Strengthening the transformation to digital journals， with the focus on attracting more attention to journals； and 4) Enhancing policy support for creating the enabling environment for journal operation.

英文关键词 forestry and grassland;scientific journal;index system;entropy weight method;comprehensive impact

起始页码 62

截止页码 71

投稿时间 2023/10/7

作者简介 余珊(1987-),女,硕士,工程师,研究方向为林草科技评价。E-mail:1048612766@qq.com

通讯作者介绍 宁攸凉(1982-),男,博士,副研究员,研究方向为林业经济理论与政策。E-mail:ningyouliang1982@163.com

E-mail ningyouliang1982@163.com

分类号 G237.5;G353.1

DOI 10.12344/lczcyj.2023.10.07.0001

参考文献 [1] 吴红军,李岩.国家林业和草原局主管科技期刊现状分析及发展建议[J].林草政策研究,2023,3(1):83-89.
[2] 邱均平,周子番,张裕晨.近十年我国计量与评价研究的发展与趋势[J].情报理论与实践,2021,44(2):192-200,184.
[3] 俞立平,潘云涛,武夷山.学术期刊综合评价数据标准化方法研究[J].图书情报工作,2009,53(12):136-139.
[4] 王兴旺,宓一鸣.国内核心(或来源)期刊评选体系的比较分析[J].科技与出版,2014,23(2):81-83.
[5] 齐东峰.国外学术期刊评价的历史演进与发展趋势分析[J].图书馆研究与工作,2021,206(8):5-10,34.
[6] 李姣.CSSCI及其评价功用解析[J].科技信息,2011,37(14):355.
[7] THELWALL M,NEVILL T.Could scientists use Altmetric.com scores to predict longer term citation counts?[J].Journal of Informetrics,2018,12(1):237-248.
[8] MEESE K A,O'CONNOR S J,BORKOWSKI N,et al.Journal rankings and directions for future research in health care management:a global perspective[J].Health Services Management Research,2017,30(2):129-137.
[9] COLLINS P M.Reputational rankings of peer-reviewed law journals:a survey approach[J].PS:Political Science & Politics,2018,51(2):377-386.
[10] DUNAISKI M,VISSER W,GELDENHUYS J.Evaluating paper and author ranking algorithms using impact and contribution awards[J].Journal of Informetrics,2016,10(2):392-407.
[11] AMJAD T,DAUD A,CHE D R,et al.MuICE:mutual influence and citation exclusivity author rank[J].Information Processing & Management,2016,52(3):374-386.
[12] 沈丹,张福颖.新媒体时代学术期刊的社会评价:学术期刊评价指标与服务创新[J].中国编辑,2018(12):53-59.
[13] 李明,贺伟,肖学斌.载文量参数修正方法在学术期刊评价指标中的应用研究[J].情报科学,2018,36(10):110-115.
[14] 许新军.优化期刊评价指标体系的五维路径:对《中文核心期刊要目总览》的建议[J].中国科技期刊研究,2018,29(2):118-124.
[15] 董建军,盛丽娜,郑成铭,等.期刊年被引论文率对期刊评价作用的探讨[J].中国科技期刊研究,2014,25(8):1000-1004.
[16] 蒋勇青,齐萍.学术期刊影响力评价方法研究[J].中国软科学,2017(3):178-185
[17] 熊国经,熊玲玲,董玉竹,等.学术期刊评价指标的权重探讨[J].统计与决策,2018,34(4):81-83.
[18] 邹晓菁,王菲菲,刘家妤.综合信息计量视角下的期刊评价指标体系研究[J].情报科学,2018,36(2):118-124.
[19] WU Q.The w-index:a measure to assess the scientific impact by focusing on widely cited papers[J].Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,2010,61(3):609-614.

PDF全文 浏览全文