山地城市坡坎崖绿化评价指标体系构建

编号 lyqk011266

中文标题 山地城市坡坎崖绿化评价指标体系构建

作者 王艺芳  李波  黄诗黎  唐欣杨  蔡恵 

作者单位 1. 重庆大学建筑城规学院 重庆 400030;
2. 山地城镇建设与新技术教育部重点实验室 重庆 400030

期刊名称 中国城市林业 

年份 2023 

卷号 21

期号 6

栏目名称 研究论文 

中文摘要 坡坎崖空间是山地城市最具特色的景观要素，对其进行绿化美化是提升城市景观品质的重要途径，然而对于坡坎崖绿化效果目前尚缺乏有效的评价方法。文章以重庆市已开展的系列坡坎崖工程为研究对象，在收集使用者诉求的基础上，综合运用词频分析、德尔菲法和层次分析法尝试构建能反映坡坎崖特征的绿化评价指标体系，并通过与使用者主观打分进行对比验证指标体系的合理性。结果表明：针对坡坎崖的绿化评价指标体系大致应包含生态性、观赏性、功能性、经济性4个准则层和14个对象层指标；不同类型的坡坎崖地段绿化重点有所不同，交通防护型侧重功能性与经济性，公园景观型侧重功能性与观赏性，而山体修复型侧重生态性与经济性；评价模型测试结果与主观评价结果呈高度正相关关系，评价指标体系总体上合理可靠。最后，根据评价结果，提出坡坎崖绿化的优化策略：打造生态绿廊、美化交通节点，丰富景观功能、突出景观特色，修复绿色基底、优化山林景观，以期为山地城市坡坎崖特殊地段绿化工程实施与效果评价提供参考。

关键词 山地城市  坡坎崖空间  绿化评价  指标体系 

基金项目 重庆英才计划包干制项目（2021YC009），重庆市技术创新与应用发展专项重点项目（CSTB2022TIAD-ZXX0051），重庆大学实验室技术安全研究项目（syaq202201001）

英文标题 Construction of Evaluation Index System for Steep Terrain Greening in Mountainous Cities

作者英文名 Wang Yifang, Li Bo, Huang Shili, Tang Xinyang, Cai Hui

单位英文名 1. Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400030, China;
2. Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of New Technology for Construction of Cities in Mountain Area, Chongqing 400030, China

英文摘要 As the steep terrain space is the most distinct landscape elements of mountainous cities, its greening and beautifying is an important way to improve the quality of urban landscape, but there is still a lack of effective evaluation methods for its greening effect. In this paper, we take a range of projects that have been implemented in Chongqing as the research object, and use word frequency analysis, Delphi method and Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) to build a greening evaluation index system that can reflect the characteristics of steep terrain space based on the collection of users' demands, and verifies the reasonability of the index system by comparing it with the users' subjective scores. The results show that the greening evaluation index system for steep terrain space should broadly include 4 criteria of ecology, ornamentality, functionality and economy, and 14 indicators. Different types of steep terrain space have different greening priorities. The traffic safety assurance type puts the focus on functionality and economy, the park landscape type focuses on functionality and ornamentality, while the mountain restoration type highlights ecology and economy. The modeled evaluation is highly positively correlated with subjective evaluation in results, and the index system of evaluation is generally reasonable and reliable. At the end, based on the evaluation results, the optimization strategy of steep terrain space greening is proposed, i.e., to create ecological green corridor, beautify traffic nodes, improve landscape functions and characteristics, repair green substrate and beatify the landscape of mountain forests, with a view to providing the references for evaluating the implementation and effects of greening project in the special steep terrain space of mountainous cities.

英文关键词 mountainous city;steep terrain spaces;greening evaluation;index system

起始页码 143

截止页码 150

投稿时间 2023/4/14

作者简介 王艺芳(1991-),女,硕士,实验师,研究方向为园林植物与应用。E-mail:314351887@qq.com

通讯作者介绍 李波(1982-),男,博士,副教授,研究方向为大地景观规划与生态修复。E-mail:elaplibo@cqu.edu.cn

E-mail elaplibo@cqu.edu.cn

DOI 10.12169/zgcsly.2023.04.14.0001

参考文献 [1] 文安邦,汤青,欧阳朝军,等.中国山地保护与山区发展:回顾与展望[J].中国科学院院刊,2023,38(3):376-384.
[2] BESIR A B,CUCE E.Green roofs and facades:a comprehensive review[J].Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews,2018,82:915-939.
[3] GARCÍA-PALACIOS P,SOLIVERES S,MAESTRE F T,et al.Dominant plant species modulate responses to hydroseeding,irrigation and fertilization during the restoration of semiarid motorway slopes[J].Ecological Engineering,2010,36(10):1290-1298.
[4] FATTET M,FU Y,GHESTEM M,et al.Effects of vegetation type on soil resistance to erosion:relationship between aggregate stability and shear strength[J].CATENA,2011,87(1):60-69.
[5] MEDL A,STANGL R,KIKUTA S B,et al.Vegetation establishment on ‘Green Walls’:Integrating shotcrete walls from road construction into the landscape[J].Urban Forestry & Urban Greening,2017,25:26-35.
[6] MARUMOTO T,KOHNO N.Environmental restoration by new technology for prevention of soil erosion and revegetation on bare slopes[J].Journal of Environmental Science and Engineering,2016,7:60-67.
[7] 廖聪全,罗评.困难立地条件下的坡坎崖景观营建体系研究:以重庆两江新区为例[J].园林,2021,38(6):19-25.
[8] 陈敏,易峥,冷炳荣,等.山地城镇边角地功能优化:以重庆市坡坎崖为例[C]//面向高质量发展的空间治理:2021中国城市规划年会论文集(15山地城乡规划).成都:重庆市规划设计研究院,2021.
[9] 重庆市人民政府办公厅.重庆市人民政府办公厅关于印发主城区坡地堡坎崖壁绿化美化实施方案的通知[J].重庆市人民政府公报,2019(20):12-16.
[10] 王艺芳,蔡恵,唐欣杨,等.山地城市典型交通附属绿地立体绿化研究[J].现代园艺,2023,46(1):131-134.
[11] 王剑,王美琳,莫茜尧,等.城市更新背景下北京石景山区城市道路绿化提升策略[J].中国城市林业,2023,21(4):59-65.
[12] 徐慧,吕庆,杨雨荷,等.边坡植被重建效果评价:研究进展与展望[J].生态学杂志,2022,41(3):589-596.
[13] 谭雪红,高艳鹏,郭小平,等.五种高速公路边坡绿化植物的生理特性及抗旱性综合评价[J].生态学报,2012,32(16):5076-5086.
[14] 岳桓陛,杨建英,杨旸,等.边坡绿化中植被毯技术保水效益评价[J].四川农业大学学报,2014,32(1):23-27.
[15] 孙珍,秦华,孙晓华,等.基于层次分析法的重庆城市主干道高边坡绿化景观美学研究[J].林业调查规划,2017,42(4):140-146.
[16] 曾照云,程安广.德尔菲法在应用过程中的严谨性评估:基于信息管理视角[J].情报理论与实践,2016,39(2):64-68.
[17] 邓雪,李家铭,曾浩健,等.层次分析法权重计算方法分析及其应用研究[J].数学的实践与认识,2012,42(7):93-100.
[18] 殷明,肖威,纪易凡,等.高速公路生态景观质量评价指标体系和评价方法:以江苏南通为例[J].应用生态学报,2018,29(12):4128-4134.
[19] 黄安文,林立,秦坤蓉,等.融合服务功能的道路绿化评价指标体系构建:以自贡市城市建成区为例[J].西南大学学报(自然科学版),2021,43(6):178-186.
[20] 陈岚,成国强,廖晨阳,等.成都市武侯区城市公园可达性分析[J].中国城市林业,2022,20(2):30-35.
[21] 宋菊芳,张晨阳,刘学军,等.武汉大学校园山体生态修复策略[J].中国城市林业,2020,18(6):131-135.

PDF全文 浏览全文