Comparative Analysis of Three Forest Management Plans in Southern Mexico

编号 010033503

推送时间 20220321

研究领域 森林生态 

年份 2022 

类型 期刊 

语种 英语

标题 Comparative Analysis of Three Forest Management Plans in Southern Mexico

来源期刊 forest

期 第335期

发表时间 20220227

关键词 conservation;  community forestry;  forest management;  forests;  Kruskal–Wallis test;  land use;  productivity;  silvicultural regimes;  trees; 

摘要 The global carbon neutrality challenge places a spotlight on forests as carbon sinks. However, greenhouse gas (GHG) balances of wood for material and energy use often reveal GHG emission savings in comparison with a non-wood reference. Is it thus better to increase wood production and use, or to conserve and expand the carbon stock in forests? GHG balances of wood products mostly ignore the dynamics of carbon storage in forests, which can be expressed as the carbon storage balance in forests (CSBF). For Germany, a CSBF of 0.25 to 1.15 t CO2-eq. m?3 wood can be assumed. When the CSBF is integrated into the GHG balance, GHG mitigation substantially deteriorates and wood products may even turn into a GHG source, e.g., in the case of energy wood. In such cases, building up forest carbon stocks would be the better option. We conclude that it is vital to include the CSBF in GHG balances of wood products to assess the impacts of wood extraction from forests. Only then can GHG balances provide political decision makers and stakeholders in the wood sector with a complete picture of GHG emissions. View Full-Text

服务人员 王璐

服务院士 蒋有绪

PDF文件 浏览全文