广州市天河公园生态系统文化服务感知

编号 lyqk009920

中文标题 广州市天河公园生态系统文化服务感知

作者 李芳  刘月亮  赵冠伟 

作者单位 1. 广州大学地理科学与遥感学院 广州 510006;
2. 湖南省娄底市第二中学 湖南娄底 417000;
3. 广州大学国土资源与海岸带研究所 广州 510006

期刊名称 中国城市林业 

年份 2022 

卷号 20

期号 3

栏目名称 研究论文 

中文摘要 城市公园是城市生态系统文化服务(CES)的重要提供者,基于居民感知视角对其进行测度具有重要意义。文章运用参与式制图和半结构访谈方法获取游客对广州天河公园生态系统文化服务的感知数据,分析CES感知结果差异,探讨社会经济因素与景观特征因素对CES感知差异的影响。结果表明:受访者在天河公园感知的主要CES类型为娱乐/游憩、审美服务;娱乐/游憩、审美和健康等CES类型分布范围较广,文化遗产、生物多样性和不安全等CES类型分布较为局限;年龄、收入、通行时间、访问频率对CES感知具有显著影响,居住时间和学历对CES感知的影响不显著;湖泊、道路、广场、亭子、乔木+座椅+铺砖、健身设施等要素对CES的空间分布具有显著影响。研究结果验证了基于问卷调查的参与式制图方法在CES评价与制图分析研究中的优势,为实现公众参与城市公园的规划管理提供参考。

关键词 生态系统文化服务  感知  影响因素  参与式制图  广州市天河公园 

基金项目 广东省自然科学基金项目生态安全约束下的南沙滨海新区土地利用变化精细模拟与优化(2017A030313240);广州市哲学社会科学十三五规划项目粤港澳大湾区生态安全评价与预警研究(2020GZGJ183);广州市科技计划市校联合项目顾及尺度效应的广州市人口分布动态精细化模拟

英文标题 Cultural Ecosystem Services Perception of Tianhe Park in Guangzhou

作者英文名 Li Fang, Liu Yueliang, Zhao Guanwei

单位英文名 1. School of Geography and Remote Sensing, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, China;
2. The Second Middle School, Loudi 417000, Hunan, China;
3. Institute of Land Resources and Coastal Zone, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, China

英文摘要 Parks are important providers of culture ecosystems services (CES) in the city, and it is significant to measure the CES in parks from the perspective of residents' perception. The paper uses the methods of participatory mapping and semi-structure interview to obtain the CES perceptions data of visitors in Tianhe Park of Guangzhou, analyzes the differences in their perceptive CES results, and discusses the influence of socio-economic and landscape characteristics factors on the differences. The results show that the main types of CES perceived by respondents in Tianhe Park are entertainment/recreation and aesthetic services; entertainment/recreation, aesthetic and health services are the CES in wide distribution, while the CES of cultural heritage, biodiversity and insecurity are sporadically distributed; among the socio-economic factors, age, income, visiting time and frequency of visits have the significant effect on CES perceptions, while duration of residence and education have the insignificant effect on CES perceptions; and among the landscape characteristics factor, lakes, roads, squares, pavilions, trees+seats+pavements and fitness facilities have a significant impact on CES perceptions. The results confirm the advantages of the questionnaire-based participatory mapping method in CES evaluation and mapping analysis, which could provide a reference for the public to participate in the planning and management of parks.

英文关键词 culture ecosystem service;perception;influencing factor;participatory mapping;Tianhe Park, Guangzhou City

起始页码 75

截止页码 81

投稿时间 2020-09-21 00:00:00

作者简介 李芳(1995-),女,硕士生,研究方向为生态系统文化服务评价。E-mail:2896574112@qq.com

通讯作者介绍 赵冠伟(1981-),男,副教授,硕士生导师,研究方向为地理时空数据分析。E-mail:zgw11124@163.com

E-mail zgw11124@163.com

DOI 10.12169/zgcsly.2020.09.21.0001

参考文献 [1] DE GROOT R S,ALKEMADE R,BRAAT L,et al.Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning,management and decision making[J].Ecological Complexity,2010,7(3):260-272.
[2] CHAN K M A,GUERRY A D,BALVANERA P,et al.Where are cultural and social in ecosystem services?A framework for constructive engagement[J].Bioscience,2012,62(8):744-756.
[3] DAILY G C.Management objectives for the protection of ecosystem services[J].Environmental Science and Policy,2000,3(6):333-339.
[4] 彭婉婷,刘文倩,蔡文博,等.基于参与式制图的城市保护地生态系统文化服务价值评价:以上海共青森林公园为例[J].应用生态学报,2019,30(2):439-448.
[5] PEDERSEN E,WEISNER S E B,JOHANSSON M.Wetland areas' direct contributions to residents' well-being entitle them to high cultural ecosystem values[J].Science of the Total Environment,2019,646:1315-1326.
[6] VAN HARDEVELD H A,DRIESSEN P P J,DE JONG H,et al.How valuing cultural ecosystem services can advance participatory resource management:the case of the Dutch peatlands[J].Ecosystem Services,2018,34:113-125.
[7] BROWN G,REED P.Validation of a forest values typology for use in national forest planning[J].Forest Science,2000,46(2):240-247.
[8] RYFIELD F,CABANA D,BRANNIGAN J,et al.Conceptualizing'sense of place'in cultural ecosystem services:a framework for interdisciplinary research[J].Ecosystem Services,2019,36:100907.
[9] SINCLAIR M,GHERMANDI A,MOSES S A,et al.Recreation and environmental quality of tropical wetlands:a social media based spatial analysis[J].Tourism Management,2019,71:179-186.
[10] STANIK N,AALDERS I,MILLER D.Towards an indicator-based assessment of cultural heritage as a cultural ecosystem service-a case study of Scottish landscapes[J].Ecological Indicators,2018,95(1):288-297.
[11] BRYCE R,IRVINE K N,CHURCH A,et al.Subjective well-being indicators for large-scale assessment of cultural ecosystem services[J].Ecosystem Services,2016,21:258-269.
[12] 梁明珠,刘志宏.城市人工湿地景区休闲游憩价值评价:以广州市南沙湿地公园为例[J].城市问题,2014(7):37-42.
[13] 李晟,郭宗香,杨怀宇,等.养殖池塘生态系统文化服务价值的评估[J].应用生态学报,2009,20(12):3075-3083.
[14] RIBEIRO F P,RIBEIRO K T.Participative mapping of cultural ecosystem services in Pedra Branca State Park, Brazil[J].Natureza and Conservação,2016,14(2):120-127.
[15] LANGEMEYER J,CALEAGNI F,BARØ F.Mapping the intangible:using geolocated social media data to examine landscape aesthetics[J].Land Use Policy,2018,77:542-552.
[16] CLEMENTE P,CALVACHE,ANTUNES P,et al.Combining social media photographs and species distribution models to map cultural ecosystem services:the case of a Natural Park in Portugal[J].Ecological Indicators,2019,96:59-68.
[17] 赵琪琪,李晶,刘婧雅,等.基于SolVES模型的关中-天水经济区生态系统文化服务评估[J].生态学报.2018,38(10):3673-3681.
[18] 戴培超,张绍良,刘润,等.生态系统文化服务研究进展:基于Web of Science分析[J].生态学报,2019,39(5):1863-1875.
[19] RALL E,BIELING C,ZYTYNSKA S,et al.Exploring city-wide patterns of cultural ecosystem service perceptions and use[J].Ecological Indicators,2017,77:80-95.
[20] IVES C D,OKE C,HEHIR A,et al.Capturing residents' values for urban green space:mapping,analysis and guidance for practice[J].Landscape and Urban Planning,2017,161:32-43.
[21] RIECHERS M,BARKMANN J,TSCHARNTKE T.Diverging perceptions by social groups on cultural ecosystem services provided by urban green[J].Landscape and Urban Planning,2018,175:161-168.
[22] SIEBER R.Public participation geographic information systems:a literature review and framework[J].Annals of the Association of American Geographers,2006,96(3):491-507.
[23] FAGERHOLM N,KÄYHKÖ N,NDUMBARO F,et al.Community stakeholders' knowledge in landscape assessments-mapping indicators for landscape services[J].Ecological Indicators,2012,18:421-433.
[24] PIETRZYK-KASZYSKA A,CZEPKIEWICZ M,KRONENBERG J.Eliciting non-monetary values of formal and informal urban green spaces using public participation GIS[J].Landscape and Urban Planning,2017,160:85-95.
[25] RETKA J,JEPSON P,LADLE R J,et al.Assessing cultural ecosystem services of a large marine protected area through social media photographs[J].Ocean and Coastal Management,2019,176(15):40-48.
[26] ZWIERZCHOWSKA I,HOF A,IOJÂ I C,et al.Multi-scale assessment of cultural ecosystem services of parks in Central European cities[J].Urban Forestry and Urban Greening,2018,30:84-97.
[27] ZHOU L L,GUAN D J,HUANG X Y,et al.Evaluation of the cultural ecosystem services of wetland park[J].Ecological Indicators,2020,114:106286.
[28] PLIENINGER T,DIJKS S,OTEROS-ROZAS E,et al.Assessing,mapping,and quantifying cultural ecosystem services at community level[J].Land Use Policy,2013,33:118-129.
[29] OTEROS-ROZAS E,MARTÍN-LØPEZ B,FAGERHOLM N,et al.Using social media photos to explore the relation between cultural ecosystem services and landscape features across five European sites[J].Ecological Indicators,2018,94(2):74-86.

PDF全文 浏览全文