数据资源: 科信所期刊全文

基于网络评论数据的国家森林公园生境认知模式



编号 lyqk011110

中文标题 基于网络评论数据的国家森林公园生境认知模式

作者 姜瑞  朱逊  高铭 

作者单位 哈尔工业大学建筑学院 自然资源部寒地国土空间规划与生态保护修复重点实验室 哈尔滨 150006

期刊名称 中国城市林业 

年份 2023 

卷号 21

期号 4

栏目名称 研究论文 

中文摘要 森林公园中的生境作为提供游憩服务、认识自然、开展生态教育的基本单元,其认知模式未得到充分研究。选取位于红松天然分布区的两个国家森林公园作为研究区域,基于网络评论数据源,从生境质量、空间结构、感知方式3个维度探究使用者的生境认知模式。结果表明:总共有9种典型森林生境认知模式;总体上森林公园中的各类生境得到了公众的认知,促进公众生境认知的因素包括特色树种、高径级、可停留或滨水空间、视觉提示物、标识解说系统与宣传工作;红松林认知强度最高、方式丰富;高生境质量对生境认知有促进作用,生境质量较低时使用者更关注人工景观;灌丛草甸、针叶林的认知存在季节差异;在此基础上,针对森林公园游憩空间设计与优化提出相关策略,以进一步增强公众对特色生境的感知认知,以及提升森林公园的游憩与教育功能。

关键词 森林公园  森林生境  偏好  网络评论数据  聚类分析 

基金项目 黑龙江省经济社会发展重点研究课题(22252);黑龙江省双创智库项目(ZKKF2022186)

英文标题 Cognitive Patterns Towards Habitats in National Forest Parks Based on Network Comment Data

作者英文名 Jiang Rui, Zhu Xun, Gao Ming

单位英文名 School of Architecture, Harbin Institute of Technology; Key Laboratory of Ministry of Natural Resources for National Territory Spatial Planning and Ecological Restoration in Cold Regions, Harbin 150006, China

英文摘要 Habitat in forest parks is a basic unit to provide recreational services, understand the nature and conducting ecological education, but the cognitive patterns of habitat are not fully studied. The study selects 2 national forest parks located in the natural distribution area of Korean pine as the study area to explore the habitat cognitive patterns of users in the three dimensions of habitat quality, spatial structure, and perception mode. The results show that there are 9 typical types of habitat cognitive patterns in forest parks, and the various habitats in the forest parks have in general gained the public cognition. The factors that have promoted the public cognition of habitats include specialty tree species, high diameter class, stayable or waterfront spaces, visual alerts, signage and interpretation system and publicity. Among the habitats, Korean pine forests have the highest cognitive intensity and more manners. High habitat quality has the propelling role in habitat cognition, while users in the low-quality habitats tend to pay more attention to artificial landscapes. Seasonal differences exist in the cognition of scrub meadow and coniferous forest. Based on the results, the strategies are proposed to design and improve recreational spaces in the forest parks, with the aim to further increase the public cognition and perception towards specialty habitats and enhance the recreational and educational functions of forest parks.

英文关键词 forest park;forest habitat;preference;network comment data;cluster analysis

起始页码 144

截止页码 150

投稿时间 2022/11/12

作者简介 姜瑞(1995-),男,博士生,研究方向为生态规划与城市生物多样性。E-mail:21B334011@stu.hit.edu.cn

通讯作者介绍 朱逊(1979-),女,博士,教授,研究方向为风景园林历史与理论、风景园林规划与设计。E-mail:zhuxun@hit.edu.cn

E-mail zhuxun@hit.edu.cn

DOI 10.12169/zgcsly.2022.11.12.0001

参考文献 [1] 赵敏燕,陈鑫峰.中国森林公园的发展与管理[J].林业科学,2016,52(1):118-127.
[2] 韩西丽,李迪华.城市残存近自然生境研究进展[J].自然资源学报,2009,24(4):561-566.
[3] STÅHLE A.Sociotope mapping:exploring public open space and its multiple use values in urban and landscape planning practice[J].Nordic Journal of Architectural Research,2013,19(4):59-71.
[4] 傅伯杰,陈利顶.景观多样性的类型及其生态意义[J].地理学报,1996,51(5):454-462.
[5] 陈波,包志毅.城市公园和郊区公园生物多样性评估的指标[J].生物多样性,2003,11(2):169-176.
[6] LHOSEST S,DUFRȆNE M,Vermeulen C,et al.Perceptions of ecosystem services provided by tropical forests to local populations in Cameroon[J].Ecosystem Services,2019,38:100956.
[7] 陈琪,王睿,张新平,等.国内外森林公园研究对比分析[J].中国城市林业,2022,20(4):140-146.
[8] 张昶,王涵,王成.植物种类及视觉面积对河岸景观的影响:以通州运河森林公园为例[J].中国城市林业,2019,17(5):18-24.
[9] DENG J Y,ANDRADA R,PIERSKALLA C.Visitors' and residents' perceptions of urban forests for leisure in Washington D.C[J].Urban Forestry and Urban Greening,2017,28(12):1-11.
[10] GLIOZZO G,PETTORELLI N,HAKLAY M.Using crowdsourced imagery to detect cultural ecosystem services:a case study in South Wales,UK[J].Ecology and Society,2016,21(3):6.
[11] ZHANG S,ZHOU W Q.Recreational visits to urban parks and factors affecting park visits:Evidence from geotagged social media data[J].Landscape and Urban Planning,2018,180:27-35.
[12] 马添姿,陈荣义,吕梁,等.基于网络文本分析的福州森林公园康养行为[J].中国城市林业,2021,19(1):128-132.
[13] YOSHIMURA N,HIURA T.Demand and supply of cultural ecosystem services:use of geotagged photos to map the aesthetic value of landscapes in Hokkaido[J].Ecosystem Services,2017,24:68-78.
[14] 王敏,陈梦璇,宋昊洋.生境质量与游憩服务的耦合协调对滨水空间活力的影响[J].中国城市林业,2022,20(3):7-13.
[15] 傅俊卿.东北天然红松林资源现状与保护经营对策[J].东北林业大学学报,2009,37(2):75-78.
[16] 崔晓阳,郭亚芬,张韫.温带森林氮营养生境特征及红松的适应性[M].北京:科学出版社,2010.
[17] AGIMASS F,LUNDHEDE T,PANDURO T E,et al.The choice of forest site for recreation:a revealed preference analysis using spatial data[J].Ecosystem Services,2018,31:445-454.
[18] ARNBERGER A,EBENBERGER M,SCHNEIDER I E,et al.Visitor preferences for visual changes in bark beetle-impacted forest recreation settings in the United States and Germany[J].Environmental Management,2018,61(2):209-223.
[19] FILYUSHKINA A,AGIMASS F,LUNDHEDE T,et al.Preferences for variation in forest characteristics:Does diversity between stands matter?[J].Ecological Economics,2017,140:22-29.
[20] 丛昕,殷敏,丁绍刚,等.游客视角的中国古典园林景点热度感知评价与传播途径研究:以苏州古典园林留园为例[J].中国园林,2021,37(8):56-61.
[21] 翟宇佳,吴承照.基于GPS数据与空间统计的城市森林公园景观偏好研究[J].中国园林,2020,36(6):45-50.
[22] 黄雅冰,翁羽西,徐伟振,等.森林公园游憩者环境偏好与脑电波关系[J].中国城市林业,2022,20(4):30-36.
[23] CAI K Y,HUANG W W,LIN G S.Bridging landscape preference and landscape design:a study on the preference and optimal combination of landscape elements based on conjoint analysis[J].Urban Forestry and Urban Greening,2022,73(7):127615.
[24] ZHANG Z,GAO Y,ZHOU S T,et al.Psychological cognitive factors affecting visual behavior and satisfaction preference for forest recreation space[J].Forests,2022,13:136.
[25] ZHOU S T,GAO Y,ZHANG Z,et al.Visual behaviour and cognitive preferences of users for constituent elements in forest landscape spaces[J].Forests,2022,13:47.
[26] 郭菲菲,王美仙.基于游客自愿拍摄法的滨河绿地植物景观偏好研究:以郑州为例[J].中国园林,2022,38(9):111-116.

PDF全文 浏览全文

相关图谱

扫描二维码