水源地输血型与造血型生态补偿机制的有效性边界——以黄浦江上游水源地为例

编号 lyqk004465

中文标题 水源地输血型与造血型生态补偿机制的有效性边界——以黄浦江上游水源地为例

作者 刘平养  张晓冰  宋佩颖 

作者单位 复旦大学环境科学与工程系,上海 200433;复旦大学环境科学与工程系,上海 200433;复旦大学环境科学与工程系,上海 200433

期刊名称 世界林业研究 

年份 2014 

卷号 27

期号 1

栏目编号 1

栏目名称 专题论述 

中文摘要 我国水源地保护普遍存在保护与发展的矛盾，而生态补偿被视为缓解这一矛盾的重要路径。无论是输血型补偿还是造血型补偿，均存在有效性边界。文中以黄浦江上游水源地为例进行研究，发现无论输血型补偿还是造血型补偿均不能有效解决水源地保护与当地社会经济发展需求之间的矛盾，水源地的社会经济活动强度是影响生态补偿有效性的关键要素。提出有效的生态补偿机制应当以整体降低水源地的社会经济活动强度为导向，结合城市化进程，不断降低区域的人口密度，激励土地利用从高强度向低强度方式转变。

关键词 水源地  输血型  造血型  生态补偿  经济活动强度  中国 

基金项目 上海市社科规划青年课题（2011JG002-EZH750）；复旦大学青年教师科研能力提升项目（20520133209）

英文标题 On the Effectiveness of Two Ecological Compensation Mechanisms：A Case Study of Drinking Water Source Land of Upstream Huangpu River

作者英文名 Liu Pingyang,Zhang Xiaobing and Song Peiying

单位英文名 Department of Environmental,Science and Engineering,Fudan University,Shanghai 200433,China;Department of Environmental,Science and Engineering,Fudan University,Shanghai 200433,China;Department of Environmental,Science and Engineering,Fudan University,Shanghai 200433,China

英文摘要 Drinking water source land protection often faces the confliction between environmental protection and economic development in China, and ecological compensation are widely regarded as one of the solutions. However, whethergovernment-led compensation or market-based compensation has clear boundaries of effectiveness. Taking the upstream Huangpu River as an example, the paper studied the ecological compensation mechanisms and found that neither the government-led compensation nor the market-based compensation can resolve the conflicts between local development demands and water source land protection, and that the intensity of social and economic activities is the key factor to influence the effectiveness of ecological compensation. Thus an efficient eco-compensation mechanism should be capable of scaling down the population density and promoting the shift from high-intensify to low-intensity land use with the focus on decreasing the intensity of social and economic activities in water source land and with the consideration of urbanization process.

英文关键词 drinking water source land;government-led compensation;market-based compensation;ecological compensation mechanism;intensity of socio-economic activity;China

起始页码 7

截止页码 11

投稿时间 2013/4/16

分类号 F062.1;F206

DOI 10.13348/j.cnki.sjlyyj.2014.01.002

参考文献 [1] 徐永田.水源保护中生态补偿方式研究[J].中国水利,2011(8):28-30.
[2] 葛颜祥,梁丽娟,接玉梅.水源地生态补偿机制的构建与运作研究[J].农业经济问题,2006 (9):22-27.
[3] 王淑云,耿雷华,黄勇,等.饮用水水源地生态补偿机制研究[J].中国水土保持,2009 (9):5-7.
[4] 刘晶,葛颜祥.我国水源地生态补偿模式的实践与市场机制的构建及政策建议[J].农业现代化研究,2011 (5):596-600.
[5] 秦艳红,康慕谊.国内外生态补偿现状及其完善措施[J].自然资源学报,2007,22(4):557-565.
[6] 刘平养.发达国家和发展中国家生态补偿机制比较分析[J].干旱区资源与环境,2010,24(9):1-5.
[7] 李慧,刘平养.以降低经济活动强度为支点撬动水源区保护[J].环境保护,2010,43(5):79-81.
[8] Hughes R,Flintan F.Integrating conservation and development experience: a review and bibliography of the LCDP literature[M].London:International Institute for Environment and Development, 2001:4-21.
[9] Pagiola S,Agostin A, Platais G.Can payments for environmental services help reduce poverty?: an exploration of the issues and the evidence to date from Latin America[J]. World Development,2004, 33(2):237-253.
[10] Katrina B,Michael W.Planning for people and parks: design dilemmas [J].World Development,1992,20(4):557-70.
[11] 青浦区环保局. 上海市青浦区创建国家环境保护模范城区考核指标自评估报告[R].上海,2009:25-29.
[12] 车越,吴阿娜,范群杰,等.基于不同利益相关方认知的水源地生态补偿探讨:以上海市水源地和用水区居民问卷调查为例[J]. 自然资源学报,2009,24(10):1829-1836.

PDF全文 浏览全文