数据资源: 科信所期刊全文

森林凋落物特性及对土壤生态功能影响研究进展



编号 lyqk009523

中文标题 森林凋落物特性及对土壤生态功能影响研究进展

作者 黄彩凤  梁晶晶  张燕林  周垂帆 

作者单位 1. 福建农林大学林学院,福州 350002;
2. 福建长汀红壤丘陵生态系统国家定位观测研究站,福建长汀 366301

期刊名称 世界林业研究 

年份 2021 

卷号 34

期号 4

栏目名称 专题论述 

中文摘要 森林凋落物组分从植物体返还到土地为地表分解者提供物质基础,是森林植物和土壤生态系统之间养分循环与能量传递的主要环节之一。文中通过整理现有森林凋落物特性及对土壤理化性质影响的相关研究成果,综述凋落物对土壤水文、土壤碳库、土壤养分、土壤酶活等物理和化学性质及土壤生物等多方面的影响,分析目前研究的不足并提出研究展望,以期为未来有效利用森林凋落物、提高土壤生态功能和更好地经营森林提供参考。

关键词 森林凋落物  土壤生态功能  土壤理化性质  土壤生物 

基金项目 国家自然科学基金“杉木是否存在通过土壤‘铁呼吸’来活化土壤铁磷的新途径?”(32071746);福建省林业科技推广项目“生物炭提高杉木幼龄林土壤磷肥力经营技术推广”(2020TG20);福建长汀红壤丘陵生态系统定位观测研究站项目(K4315002A)

英文标题 Research Review of Forest Litter Characteristics and Its Effects on Soil Ecological Function

作者英文名 Huang Caifeng, Liang Jingjing, Zhang Yanlin, Zhou Chuifan

单位英文名 1. Forestry College, Fujian Agriculture and Forest University, Fuzhou 350002, China;
2. Changting National Positioning Observation and Research Station of Red Soil Hill Ecosystem, Changting 366301, Fujian, China

英文摘要 Forest litter components fall on the land from plants and provide the material basis for the surface decomposers, which is one of the main links of nutrient cycling and energy transfer between forest plants and soil ecosystem. This paper collates the related research results about the forest litter characteristics and their impact on soil physical and chemical properties, summarizes the effect of the litters on soil hydrology, soil carbon, soil nutrients, soil enzyme activity and other physical and chemical properties and soil biological aspects, and analyzes the deficiency of the present study, in order to provide the reference for the effective utilization of forest litters, improvement of the soil ecological functions, and better forest management in the future.

英文关键词 forest litter;soil ecological function;soil physical and chemical property;soil organism

起始页码 20

截止页码 25

投稿时间 2020/10/15

最后修改时间 2020/12/30

作者简介 黄彩凤,女,硕士研究生,主要研究领域为生态土壤修复,E-mail:867587995@qq.com

通讯作者介绍 周垂帆,博士,副教授,硕士研究生导师,主要研究领域为土壤改良,E-mail:zhouchuifan@163.com

E-mail 867587995@qq.com;zhouchuifan@163.com

分类号 S718.55

DOI 10.13348/j.cnki.sjlyyj.2020.0134.y

参考文献 [1] JIA B, XU Z, ZHOU G, et al. Statistical characteristics of forest litterfall in China[J]. Science China Life Sciences, 2018, 61(3):358-360.
[2] 凌华, 陈光水, 陈志勤. 中国森林凋落量的影响因素[J]. 亚热带资源与环境学报,2009,4(4):66-71.
[3] 贾丙瑞, 周广胜, 刘永志, 等. 中国天然林凋落物量的空间分布及其影响因子分析[J]. 中国科学(生命科学),2016,46(11):1304-1311.
[4] 郭婧, 喻林华, 方晰, 等. 中亚热带4种森林凋落物量、组成、动态及其周转期[J]. 生态学报,2015,35(14):4668-4677.
[5] 袁方, 黄力, 魏玉洁, 等. 中国天然林凋落物量特征及其与气候因子的关系[J]. 生态学杂志,2018,37(10):3038-3046.
[6] AMIN B A Z, CHABBERT B, MOORHEAD D, et al. Impact of fine litter chemistry on lignocellulolytic enzyme efficiency during decomposition of maize leaf and root in soil[J]. Biogeochemistry, 2014, 117(1):169-183.
[7] 马淑敏, 辛学兵, 裴顺祥, 等. 森林凋落物生产及分解研究进展[J]. 陕西林业科技,2019,47(1):104-108.
[8] WALL D H, BRADFORD M A, JOHN M G S, et al. Global decomposition experiment shows soil animal impacts on decomposition are climate-dependent[J]. Global Change Biology, 2008, 14(11):2661-2677.
[9] GARCIAPALACIOS P, MAESTRE F T, KATTGE J, et al. Climate and litter quality differently modulate the effects of soil fauna on litter decomposition across biomes[J]. Ecology Letters, 2013, 16(8):1045-1053.
[10] SILVER W L, MIYA R K. Global patterns in root decomposition: comparisons of climate and litter quality effects[J]. Oecologia, 2001, 129(3):407-419.
[11] OSONO T, TAKEDA H. Organic chemical and nutrient dynamics in decomposing beech leaf litter in relation to fungal ingrowth and succession during 3-year decomposition processes in a cool temperate deciduous forest in Japan[J]. Ecological Research, 2010, 16(4):649-670.
[12] 陈汉章, 刘志中. 氮添加对马尾松人工林凋落物分解及其微生物活性的影响[J]. 水土保持研究,2020,27(1):73-80.
[13] XIA L, SONG X, FU N, et al. Effects of forest litter cover on hydrological response of hillslopes in the Loess Plateau of China[J]. CATENA, 2019, 181:104076. DOI:10.1016/j.catena.2019.104076
[14] 王忠禹, 刘国彬, 王兵, 等. 黄土丘陵区典型植物枯落物凋落动态及其持水性[J]. 生态学报,2019,39(7):2416-2425.
[15] 朱金兆, 刘建军, 朱清科, 等. 森林凋落物层水文生态功能研究[J]. 北京林业大学学报,2002, 24(增刊1):30-34.
[16] GOMYO M, KURAJI K. Effect of the litter layer on runoff and evapotranspiration using the paired watershed method[J]. Journal of Forest Research, 2016, 21(6):306-313.
[17] 丁晓东, 马香丽, 高敏, 等. 间伐对华北落叶松人工林凋落物和土壤理化性质的影响研究[J]. 河北林果研究,2014,29(4):351-355.
[18] 闫文德, 张学龙, 王金叶, 等. 祁连山森林枯落物水文作用的研究[J]. 西北林学院学报,1997,12(2):8-15.
[19] 葛晓改. 三峡库区马尾松林凋落物分解及对土壤碳库动态的影响研究[D].北京: 中国林业科学研究院, 2012.
[20] 马文济. 浙江宁波常绿阔叶林演替对土壤碳库结构的影响[D]. 上海: 华东师范大学, 2015.
[21] 杨文焕, 王铭浩, 李卫平, 等. 黄河湿地包头段不同地被类型对土壤有机碳的影响[J]. 生态环境学报,2018,27(6):1034-1043.
[22] ZHANG X, LI Y, NING C, et al. Litter management as a key factor relieves soil respiration decay in an urban-adjacent camphor forest under a short-term nitrogen increment[J]. Forests, 2020, 11(2). DOI:10.3390/f11020216
[23] 赵欣然, 赵琼, 王巍巍, 等. 氮添加及凋落物管理对樟子松人工林土壤理化性质的影响[J]. 生态学杂志,2016,35(10):2699-2706.
[24] 陈光升. 华西雨屏区几种植被恢复模式凋落物的生态功能研究[D]. 四川雅安: 四川农业大学, 2008.
[25] HATTENSCHWILER S, GASSER P. Soil animals alter plant litter diversity effects on decomposition[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2005, 102(5):1519-1524.
[26] 陈堆全. 木荷凋落物分解及对土壤作用规律的研究[J]. 福建林业科技,2001,28(2):35-38.
[27] 刘强. 中亚热带不同更新方式森林凋落物数量及养分动态[D]. 福州: 福建师范大学, 2012.
[28] 赵畅. 茂兰喀斯特森林凋落物—土壤系统的养分动态变化及其相互影响机制[D]. 贵阳: 贵州师范大学, 2018.
[29] 吴敏. 香梓楠人工林养分利用效率及养分归还动态研究[D]. 南宁: 广西大学, 2014.
[30] USELMAN S M, QUALLS R G, LILIENFEIN J. Quality of soluble organic C, N, and P produced by different types and species of litter: root litter versus leaf litter[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2012, 54:57-67.
[31] 衣晓丹. 不同发育阶段杉木人工林土壤理化性质及凋落物养分储存量研究[D]. 北京: 北京林业大学, 2013.
[32] YANO Y, LAJTHA K, SOLLINS P, et al. Chemistry and dynamics of dissolved organic matter in a temperate coniferous forest on andic soils: effects of litter quality[J]. Ecosystems, 2005, 8(3):286-300.
[33] USELMAN S M, QUALLS R G, LILIENFEIN J. Production of total potentially soluble organic C, N, and P across an ecosystem chronosequence: root versus leaf litter[J]. Ecosystems, 2009, 12(2):240-260.
[34] GONG C, SONG C, SUN L, et al. Response of methane emissions to litter input manipulation in a temperate freshwater marsh, Northeast China[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2020:115. DOI:10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106377
[35] SANDERMAN J, AMUNDSON R. A comparative study of dissolved organic carbon transport and stabilization in California forest and grassland soils[J]. Biogeochemistry, 2008, 89:309-327.
[36] GE X, XIAO W, ZENG L, et al. Relationships between soil–litter interface enzyme activities and decomposition in Pinus massoniana plantations in China[J]. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 2017, 17(4):996-1008.
[37] 胡亚林, 汪思龙, 黄宇, 等. 凋落物化学组成对土壤微生物学性状及土壤酶活性的影响[J]. 生态学报,2005,25(10):2662-2668.
[38] RAHMAN M M, TSUKAMOTO J, YONEYAMA A, et al. Lignin and its effects on litter decomposition in forest ecosystems[J]. Chemistry and Ecology, 2013, 29(6):540-553.
[39] 于彬彬. 不同气候带下的植物资源输入方式改变对土壤线虫和微生物群落的影响[D]. 河南开封: 河南大学, 2019.
[40] 何振. 南方不同森林类型土壤节肢动物多样性研究[D]. 北京: 中国林业科学研究院, 2018.
[41] 吴福忠, 谭波. 森林凋落物分解过程与土壤动物的相互关系研究进展[J]. 四川农业大学学报,2018,36(5):569-575.
[42] SEEBER J, SCHEU S, MEYER E. Effects of macro-decomposers on litter decomposition and soil properties in alpine pastureland: a mesocosm experiment[J]. Applied Soil Ecology, 2006, 34(2):168-175.
[43] WARREN M W, ZOU X. Soil macrofauna and litter nutrients in three tropical tree plantations on a disturbed site in Puerto Rico[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2002, 170(1/2/3):161-171.
[44] HUNTER M D, ADL S, PRINGLE C M, et al. Relative effects of macroinvertebrates and habitat on the chemistry of litter during decomposition[J]. Pedobiologia, 2003, 47(2):101-115.
[45] 夏磊. 土壤动物对高山/亚高山森林凋落物分解的贡献[D]. 四川雅安: 四川农业大学, 2012.
[46] 杜晓芳, 李英滨, 刘芳, 等. 土壤微食物网结构与生态功能[J]. 应用生态学报,2018,29(2):403-411.
[47] KUBARTOVA A, MOUKOUMI J, BEGUIRISTAIN T, et al. Microbial diversity during cellulose decomposition in different forest stands: I. microbial communities and environmental conditions[J]. Microbial Ecology, 2007, 54(3):393-405.
[48] 龙健, 赵畅, 张明江, 等. 不同坡向凋落物分解对土壤微生物群落的影响[J]. 生态学报,2019,39(8):2696-2704.
[49] 张冰冰, 万晓华, 杨军钱, 等. 不同凋落物质量对杉木人工林土壤微生物群落结构的影响[J]. 土壤学报, 2021, 58(4). DOI:10.11766/trxb201912260562.

发布日期 2021-01-05

PDF全文 浏览全文

相关图谱

扫描二维码